Value Orientation Assessment Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Not important at all to me
- Not very important
- Moderately important
- Very important
- Most important value
- Not at all important to me
- Not very important
- Moderately important
- Very important
- Most important
- Not important to me at all
- Not very important
- Moderately important
- Very important
- The most important value
Value Orientation Assessment Test - Description and methodology of the test
Readers comparing priorities across relationships, work, beliefs, and security may find the Value Orientation Assessment Test useful. It places these areas side by side, so a personal values assessment can help clarify where demands compete in everyday decisions. The result is descriptive rather than a verdict about which preference is best.
What This Assessment Explores
Values are preferred life directions, not fixed traits. A value assessment shows relative importance now, not a superior pattern.
Each scale spans 3-15. Displayed bands are 3-7, 8-11, and 12-15; Civic and Political Engagement and Safety and Security use 3-6, 7-11, and 12-15. Labels vary by scale.
- Service, Freedom, Openness, and Democracy in Society, and Civic and Political Engagement measure helping, justice, and participation.
- Interpersonal Contacts and Communication, Attachment and Love, Vivid Life Experiences, and Sensory Pleasures and Enjoyment measure connection, closeness, novelty, and enjoyment.
- Professional Qualities, Interesting Work, Material Success, Personal Growth, and Fame measure competence, fulfilment, prosperity, development, and recognition.
- Attractiveness, Moral Qualities, Health, and Power and Influence measure appearance, ethics, wellbeing, and leadership.
- Rich Spiritual and Religious Life, Spiritual and Cultural Enrichment, Safety and Security, and Autonomy measure faith, culture, stability, and independence.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each statement asks how important a life aim is, using five ordered choices from Not important at all to Most important value. The items cover social contribution, relationships, autonomy, pleasure, work, recognition, spirituality, health, security, and self-development. Responses form separate dimension scores, so the result compares priorities rather than producing one total. In this value orientation questionnaire, displayed bands classify each dimension within its own score range rather than ranking the respondent against a population.
The related Nikolaev Value Orientation Method is a source instrument for comparison. This questionnaire is conceptually consistent with its emphasis on preferred life directions, Rokeach’s model of human values, and Schwartz’s theory of value structure, but this online questionnaire is not a direct adaptation of those sources.
Scores should be read together and against current circumstances. Self-report can reflect context, self-awareness, and impression management; because population norms and reliability estimates are not stated, the result cannot establish clinical status or explain causes.
- Nikolaev, A.N. (2000). Methodology for studying value orientations. In Psychological foundations of learning and education (pp. 40-43). Saint Petersburg: Lesgaft State Academy of Physical Education.
- Rokeach, M. (1973). The Nature of Human Values. New York: The Free Press.
- Schwartz, S.H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1-65. 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6