Intrapersonal Conflict Level Assessment Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Not feel upset
- Feel slightly upset
- Feel upset
- Feel desperate
- Openly express my emotions
- Other
- Not feel upset
- Feel slightly upset
- Feel upset
- Feel desperate
- Openly express my emotions
- Other
- Not upset
- Slightly upset
- Upset
- Desperate
- Openly express my emotions
- Other
Intrapersonal Conflict Level Assessment Test - Description and methodology of the test
People who feel pulled between personal wishes, obligations, self-expectations, and practical limits may use the Intrapersonal Conflict Level Assessment Test to organize these experiences. This intrapersonal conflict assessment is intended for people seeking a structured view of recurring inner tension, emotional reactions, and difficult choices. The profile points to areas for closer reflection rather than reducing experience to one label.
What This Assessment Explores
Results form an intrapersonal conflict profile from disappointment, restraint, commitments, rules, roles, values, and blocked wishes. The dimensions and bands are:
- Self-Esteem (0-54) covers aspiration/capability conflict: Low conflict 0-18/Moderate conflict 19-36/High conflict 37-54; Musts and Shoulds (0-54) covers duty/desire tension: Low 0-18/Moderate 19-36/High 37-54.
- Motivation (0-54) covers competing motives/goals: Low conflict 0-18/Moderate conflict 19-36/High conflict 37-54; Inadequate Self-Esteem Conflict (0-18) covers aspiration/capability discrepancy: Low conflict 0-5/Moderate conflict 6-11/High conflict 12-18.
- Adaptation Conflict (0-18) covers demands/capacity imbalance: Low 0-6, Moderate 7-12, High 13-18; Role Conflict (0-18) covers role integration: Low 0-5, Moderate 6-12, High 13-18.
- Unfulfilled Desire Conflict (0-18), Moral Conflict (0-18), and Motivational Conflict (0-18) cover blocked wishes, value/norm conflict, and competing needs: Low 0-6, Moderate 7-12, High 13-18.
- Overall Level of Intrapersonal Conflict (0-108) reflects contradictions, doubts, and distress: Low 0-50, Moderate 51-72, High 73-108; moderate also indicates self-reflection, resilience, and flexible adaptation.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
An intrapersonal conflict questionnaire uses self-report responses to brief situations, not factual knowledge questions. Options move from no upset or worry through slight distress to desperation; some permit open emotional expression or Other. The format records reactions when desires meet duties, health, rules, relationships, work, or conduct.
Scoring aggregates broad domains and subscales, then places each result in its stated band. Higher scores indicate greater conflict on the named scale. Ranges do not reveal how many points each answer contributes. Shipilov’s Intrapersonal Conflict Test is the closest named reference; this questionnaire is conceptually consistent with its conflictology framework, not a direct adaptation.
Fantalova’s model clarifies tensions between values and opportunities, while Letyagina’s study supplies an applied comparison involving upbringing and acceptance of deviant behavior. These sources support construct-level interpretation, not claims that this version shares their samples, norms, reliability, or validation.
The online version provides bands, but its standardization, reliability estimates, and clinical cutoffs are not established by these sources. Current stress, recall, and willingness to disclose can influence scores, so the profile is best read as structured reflection on present experience.
- Antsupov, Anatoly Ya., and Anatoly I. Shipilov. Conflictology: A Textbook for Universities. 5th revised and expanded ed. Saint Petersburg: Piter, 2014. ISBN 978-5-496-00113-7.
- Letyagina, S. K. “Features of the Relationship of Intrapersonal Conflict with Family Upbringing Styles and Acceptability of Deviant Behavior among Law Students.” Human Capital, no. 8 (152), 2021, pp. 112-118. 10.25629/HC.2021.08.12.
- Fantalova, Elena B. Values and Internal Conflicts: Theory, Methodology, Diagnostics. Saarbrucken: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, 2012.