Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
business communication

Interaction Tactics Questionnaire Test

Take the online Interaction Tactics Questionnaire Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Interaction Tactics Questionnaire Testhere. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
See how you typically build relationships, through competition or collaboration, in just 2 minutes. Ten quick items give clear, practical insight to improve communication, teamwork, and coaching outcomes.
Start Online Test
Questions: 102 minutes
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
October 2, 2025
Material has been published
17,311 views
1,715 completions
1,496 likes
Verified by Daniel Hall
Psychologist with 25 years of experience
Share
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score
5/10
Confrontation (C)
Measures how strongly a person tends to insist on their own position in interactions, even when it conflicts with others' interests.
Cooperative
Balanced
Confrontational
03: Cooperative | 46: Balanced | 710: Confrontational
A score of 5 indicates a balanced approach, with some willingness to assert your position while still leaving room for compromise.
example score
5/10
Collaboration (C)
Measures the tendency to seek mutually beneficial solutions by considering all parties’ interests during interaction.
Limited collaboration
Balanced collaboration
Strong collaboration
03: Limited collaboration | 47: Balanced collaboration | 810: Strong collaboration
A score of 5 suggests a balanced collaborative style, with a moderate inclination to look for joint solutions while still keeping personal priorities in view.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Team leads and managers
41%OF USERS
They take it to see whether they default to confrontation or cooperation and how that shapes team dynamics and conflicts.
Coaching and training clients
34%OF USERS
They use it as a quick self-check to spot their typical interaction style and set clear goals for improving communication.
Couples and close partners
25%OF USERS
They take it to understand how they negotiate, argue, and compromise so conversations feel less like a battle.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Confrontation (C)
Confrontation (C)
Average
5.9
Normal range
4.57.2
min.
0
max.
10
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Collaboration (C)
Collaboration (C)
Average
3.6
Normal range
25.3
min.
0
max.
10
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Featured On
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment
Interaction Tactics Test

Interaction Tactics Questionnaire Test - Symptoms and Signs

business communication
business

This measure is designed to assess typical interpersonal approaches in situations that involve differences in goals or interests. The Interaction Tactics Questionnaire provides a brief self-report snapshot of how an individual tends to manage disagreement and coordinate with others in everyday interactions.

Developed by Kenneth W. Thomas and Ralph H. Kilmann, it consists of 10 items and takes about 2 minutes to complete. Responses are intended to support clinical or consultative discussion of the respondent’s preferred interaction style, such as prioritizing one’s own position versus seeking collaboration or compromise. Results from the Interaction Tactics Questionnaire should be interpreted in context and integrated with other relevant assessment information rather than used as a stand-alone diagnostic indicator.

Author: Kenneth W. Thomas, Ralph H. Kilmann
Literature: Fisher, R., Ury, W., & Patton, B. Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. Penguin Books. 1991.
Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment