Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
arrange

Survey of Perceived Organizational Support (SPOS) Test

Take the online Survey of Perceived Organizational Support (SPOS) Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Survey of Perceived Organizational Support (SPOS) Test here. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
In just two minutes, the Survey of Perceived Organizational Support (SPOS) Test presents eight statements about how your organization treats your contribution and well-being. Your result can clarify your felt level of support, providing a useful starting point for workplace self-reflection.
Questions: 82 minutes
Survey of Perceived Organizational: test ticket with numbers
October 2, 2025October 2, 2025Material has been updatedOctober 2, 2025Material has been published
22,236 views
2,159 completions
1,755 likes
Daniel HallPsychologist · Test reviewer
1,755 likes
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

Perceived Organizational Support LevelPOSL
Measures how strongly an employee feels the organization values their contribution and cares about their wellbeing.
example score34/48
34/48High supportexample score
0 – 16Low support
17 – 32Moderate support
33 – 48High support
A score of 34 indicates a high level of perceived organizational support, suggesting the employee generally feels recognized and cared for by the organization.
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Employees in changing teams
41%OF USERS
People going through reorganizations, new managers, or fast growth take it to check whether they feel valued and supported during change.
HR and engagement leads
34%OF USERS
HR specialists use it to spot where support is lacking across groups and to guide actions that improve motivation and retention.
Managers of small teams
25%OF USERS
Team leads take it to understand how their direct reports perceive support and what might be hurting trust and performance.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Shaded area — where most people score
Dot — the average
You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test
Perceived Organizational Support LevelPOSL
You?
Average15.1
Typical rangeTypical8.6 – 21.5
Possible0 – 48
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Somewhat disagree
    • Not sure
    • Somewhat agree
    • Agree
    • Strongly agree
    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Somewhat disagree
    • Not sure
    • Somewhat agree
    • Agree
    • Strongly agree
    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Somewhat disagree
    • Not sure
    • Somewhat agree
    • Agree
    • Strongly agree
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

Survey of Perceived Organizational Support (SPOS) Test - Description and methodology of the test

arrange

Managers, employees, and people reflecting on workplace relationships can use the Survey of Perceived Organizational Support (SPOS) Test to examine whether their organization values their work and attends to their welfare. As a workplace support assessment, it organizes perceptions about recognition, responsiveness, job satisfaction, and care. The result offers a concise profile for reflection on workplace climate and motivation.

What This Assessment Explores

At its core, this organizational support survey asks whether employees believe the organization values their contributions and cares about their well-being. The statements cover recognition, attention to concerns, job satisfaction, and pride in employees' accomplishments.

The result is a single Perceived Organizational Support Level score. Its displayed bands are Low support (0-16), Moderate support (17-32), and High support (33-48). Higher results indicate stronger perceived appreciation and care; lower results suggest less perceived attention or recognition.

The questionnaire groups its content around these experiences:

  • Recognition of contribution shows whether effort appears visible and valued.
  • Care for well-being reflects attention to the employee beyond immediate output.
  • Responsiveness to concerns indicates whether complaints seem likely to receive attention.
  • Pride and satisfaction capture perceived investment in achievements and job experience.

Methodology and Evidence Base

Each statement uses seven-point response options from Strongly disagree to Strongly agree, including a middle uncertainty option. Positive and negatively framed items ask the respondent to judge appreciation, care, recognition, and responsiveness from the same organizational perspective. Careful reading matters because agreement does not mean the same thing in every item.

This questionnaire is conceptually consistent with the original SPOS described by Eisenberger et al. (1986), but this online version is not independently validated and may not be identical to the published instrument. Rhoades and Eisenberger (2002) synthesized evidence about the broader perceived-organizational-support construct and its work-attitude relationships; that research does not validate this specific online form.

Here, perceived support at work is summarized in one overall result rather than separate subscales. The questionnaire displays that result on a 0-48 scale, but its item-to-score conversion is not documented. No population norms or independent standardization are stated for this online version, so the displayed bands are catalogue categories, not established norms. Current events, manager relationships, fear of consequences, and limited self-awareness can shape answers; compare results with workplace experiences and broader feedback.

Author: Debora Sowa, Robert Eisenberger, Robin Huntington, Steven Hutchison
Literature:
  • Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500-507. 10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500
  • Hochwarter, W. A., Kacmar, C. M., Perrewé, P. L., & Johnson, D. (2003). Perceived organizational support as a mediator of the relationship between politics perceptions and work outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63(3), 438-456. 10.1016/S0001-8791(02)00048-9
  • Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698-714. 10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.698

Updated:

Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment