Broad Autism Phenotype Questionnaire (BAPQ) Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Very rarely
- Rarely
- Sometimes
- Quite often
- Often
- Very often
- Very rarely
- Rarely
- Sometimes
- Quite often
- Often
- Very often
- Very rarely
- Rarely
- Sometimes
- Fairly often
- Often
- Very often
Broad Autism Phenotype Questionnaire (BAPQ) Test - Description and methodology of the test
Adults questioning why some situations feel unusually demanding may use the Broad Autism Phenotype Questionnaire (BAPQ) Test as a structured prompt for self-reflection. It can help people considering adult autism traits organize recurring experiences and identify useful next questions, without reducing a varied life to a single identity or explanation.
What This Assessment Explores
The situations cover conversation, reciprocity, novelty, routines, and closeness. The result describes reported experiences, not a symptom checklist. People considering an autism questionnaire for adults can use it to see which area is most pronounced.
The displayed dimensions are:
- Pragmatic Language (1-6) measures difficulty using language socially; Low 1-2.95 and Elevated 2.96-6 indicate its reported level.
- Rigidity (1-6) measures difficulty adapting to change and low interest in novelty; Flexible 1-3.64 and Rigid 3.65-6 indicate the result.
- Aloofness (1-6) measures lack of interest in or enjoyment of social interaction; higher scores may indicate difficulty initiating or maintaining social relationships. Low alienation 1-3.24 and High alienation 3.25-6 indicate its reported level.
- Total Score (1-6) reflects the severity of broad autism phenotype traits; Lower traits 1-3.34 and Elevated 3.35-6 indicate the combined profile.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
The questionnaire presents six frequency choices from Very rarely to Very often for statements about communication, conversation, flexibility, or social engagement. It reports domain and total results, but the online form does not state how weighting, reversal, or averaging is handled; the displayed ranges cannot reveal an undisclosed formula.
The method is conceptually consistent with the published BAPQ domains described by Hurley et al. (2007): communication style, flexibility, and social interest. The online form is not established as the published instrument or a validated adaptation, and its presentation has no documented standardization or norms.
Sasson et al. (2013) examined how BAPQ scores related to prevalence and classification outcomes, while Ingersoll et al. (2011) compared it with other self-report tools in a non-clinical sample. These studies add context, but they do not establish norms for this online form.
For a preliminary view of trait patterns, the autism screening questionnaire can show how reported experiences cluster. Current context, self-awareness, and response honesty can shape the profile, so the bands and result are descriptive rather than diagnostic and cannot explain individual functioning.
- Hurley, Robert S. E., Molly Losh, Morgan Parlier, J. Steven Reznick, and Joseph Piven. "The Broad Autism Phenotype Questionnaire." Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2007, 37(9), 1679-1690. 10.1007/s10803-006-0299-3
- Sasson, Noah J., Kristen S. L. Lam, Debra Childress, Morgan Parlier, Julie L. Daniels, and Joseph Piven. "The Broad Autism Phenotype Questionnaire: Prevalence and Diagnostic Classification." Autism Research, 2013, 6(2), 134-143. 10.1002/aur.1272
- Ingersoll, Brooke, Christopher J. Hopwood, Allison Wainer, and M. Brent Donnellan. "A Comparison of Three Self-Report Measures of the Broader Autism Phenotype in a Non-Clinical Sample." Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2011, 41(12), 1646-1657. 10.1007/s10803-011-1192-2
Updated: