Ethnic Identity Types Questionnaire Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Agree
- Somewhat agree
- Neither agree nor disagree
- Somewhat disagree
- Disagree
- Agree
- Rather agree
- Agree in some ways, disagree in others
- Rather disagree
- Disagree
- Agree
- Rather agree
- Partly agree, partly disagree
- Rather disagree
- Disagree
Ethnic Identity Types Questionnaire Test - Description and methodology of the test
People who want to examine how ethnic belonging may shape judgments, loyalties, and reactions to difference may find the Ethnic Identity Types Questionnaire Test useful as a structured exercise. It suits readers considering cultural loyalty, tolerance, distance, exclusion, or feelings of superiority in their own reactions. This ethnic identity assessment helps organize the situations and attitudes they may want to examine more closely.
What This Assessment Explores
Results form an ethnic identity profile showing openness, withdrawal, superiority, exclusion, or uncertainty.
- Ethnic Isolationism (0-20) measures group superiority, opposition to interethnic marriage, and xenophobia: Low 0-8; Moderate 9-16; High 17-20.
- Ethnic Fanaticism (0-20) measures radical action, restrictions on other groups, and ethnic rights above human rights: Low 0-8; Moderate 9-16; High 17-20.
- Ethno-Egoism (0-20) reflects a “my people” lens, benign or tense toward others: Low 0-8; Moderate 9-16; High 17-20.
- Norm (Positive Ethnic Identity) (0-20) reflects positive attitudes, tolerance, and peaceful interaction across groups: Low PEI 0-8; Moderate PEI 9-16; High PEI 17-20.
- Ethnic Indifference (0-20) reflects diffuse identity, uncertain affiliation, and low ethnic salience: Low indifference 0-8; Moderate indifference 9-16; High indifference 17-20.
- Ethno-Nihilism (0-20) reflects hypo-identity, distancing from one’s group, and non-ethnic niches: Low ethnonihilism 0-8; Moderate ethnonihilism 9-16; High ethnonihilism 17-20.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each statement uses five agreement choices from agree to disagree, with a middle option. Items address cultural preference, superiority, intergroup contact, exclusion, conflict, and distance from ethnic affiliation. Responses form dimension scores that are interpreted through the displayed low, moderate, and high bands; the questionnaire does not state how many points each answer contributes.
Conceptually, it is consistent with the Types of Ethnic Identity Questionnaire, a separate published instrument, but it is not a documented adaptation of that instrument. The online questionnaire has no stated standardization or validation for these displayed scores. Phinney’s Multigroup Ethnic Identity Measure is a distinct comparison instrument and does not validate the six scales or establish their scoring.
For interpretation, this ethnic identity test is best read as a pattern of tendencies connected to the situations behind the answers. Self-report can be affected by current mood, self-awareness, and impression management, so the profile is not a fixed identity or clinical conclusion.
- Soldatova, Galina Urtanbekovna. Psychology of Interethnic Tension. Moscow: Smysl, 1998. ISBN 978-5-89357-029-8.
- Berberyan, Asya, and Satenik Tepanyan. The Relationship Between Ethnic Identity and Personality Traits in Armenians in the Titular Nation and the Diaspora in Russia. Katchar Scientific Periodical, no. 1, 2023, pp. 63-79. 10.54503/2579-2903-2023.1-63
- Phinney, Jean S. The Multigroup Ethnic Identity Measure: A New Scale for Use with Diverse Groups. Journal of Adolescent Research, vol. 7, no. 2, 1992, pp. 156-176. 10.1177/074355489272003
Updated: