Behavioral Self-Regulation Style Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Not true
- Probably not true
- Not sure
- Probably true
- True
- Not true
- Probably not true
- Not sure
- Probably true
- True
- False
- Probably false
- Not sure
- Probably true
- True
Behavioral Self-Regulation Style Test - Description and methodology of the test
For readers who want to understand how they organize effort, respond to pressure, and adjust their behavior, the Behavioral Self-Regulation Style Test offers a structured personal profile. It can clarify strengths and possible friction points in goal pursuit, planning, persistence, and self-evaluation. As a self-regulation assessment, it is most useful for reflective learning and everyday behavior review.
What This Assessment Explores
This behavioral self-regulation profile covers planning, persistence, adaptation, monitoring, and appraisal. Its dimensions of conscious regulation are:
- Persistence (1-5) shows perseverance: Low persistence 1-2.9; Moderate persistence 3-4.5; High persistence 4.6-5.
- Reliability (1-5) shows stable performance under stress: Low 1-1.7; Moderate 1.8-3.6; High 3.7-5.
- Flexibility (1-5) shows adjustment: Low flexibility 1-2.9; Moderate flexibility 3-4.4; High flexibility 4.5-5.
- Evaluation of Results (1-5) shows appraisal: Limited evaluation 1-2; Developing evaluation 2.1-4; Strong evaluation 4.1-5.
- Action Programming (1-5) shows sequencing: Low structure 1-2.9; Moderate structure 3-4.6; High structure 4.7-5.
- Modeling of Goal-Relevant Conditions (1-5) shows awareness of relevant conditions: Limited modeling 1-2.9; Adequate modeling 3-4.4; Strong modeling 4.5-5.
- Goal Planning (1-5) shows goal-setting style: Limited planning 1-2.3; Balanced planning 2.4-4.3; Highly structured planning 4.4-5.
- Overall Level of Self-Regulation (1-5) shows conscious regulation: Low 1-2.8; Moderate 2.9-3.9; High 4-5.
Methodology and Evidence Base
Items are first-person statements about planning, reviewing progress, noticing conditions, changing strategies, working under emotion, and persisting toward results. As a self-regulation style questionnaire, it uses five ordered options, usually from Not true to True, so respondents express degree rather than choose only yes or no.
Scoring presents results on 1-5 dimensions and an overall profile. Because no separate point-conversion formula is stated, interpretation should follow the displayed bands rather than inferred item weights.
Conceptually, the questionnaire is consistent with SRPQM 2020 (Morosanova & Kondratyuk, 2020), which treats conscious regulation as a connected system for representing conditions, structuring action, evaluating outcomes, adapting, and maintaining performance. Morosanova’s 2021 framework and Morosanova and Bondarenko’s 2015 diagnostic approach provide additional theoretical context.
However, this online version is not presented as a standardized adaptation of SRPQM 2020 or a population-normed clinical measure; self-report results may vary with mood, self-awareness, and the situation the respondent has in mind, so they are best read as a structured snapshot.
- Morosanova, V. I., and Kondratyuk, N. G. (2020). V. I. Morosanova’s Self-Regulation Profile Questionnaire-SRPQM 2020. Questions of Psychology, 66(4), 155-167. (In Russian.)
- Morosanova, V. I. (2021). Conscious Self-Regulation as a Metaresource for Achieving Goals and Solving Problems of Human Activity. Moscow University Psychology Bulletin, 44(1), 3-37. 10.11621/vsp.2021.01.01. (In Russian.)
- Morosanova, V. I., and Bondarenko, I. N. (2015). Diagnostics of Human Self-Regulation. Moscow: Kogito-Tsentr. (In Russian.)
Updated: