Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
transactional analysis

Fixed Emotional Set Level Test

Take the online Fixed Emotional Set Level Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Fixed Emotional Set Level Test here. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
With 57 questions and an estimated completion time of 11 minutes, the Fixed Emotional Set Level Test examines how everyday attitudes relate to optimism, responsibility, flexibility, relationships, and goal pursuit. Its single result offers a broad picture of well-being and life strategies, supporting structured self-reflection about your current profile.
Questions: 5711 minutes
Fixed Emotional Set Level: situation and reply bubbles
October 2, 2025October 2, 2025Material has been updatedOctober 2, 2025Material has been published
22,869 views
2,159 completions
1,824 likes
Daniel HallPsychologist · Test reviewer
1,824 likes
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

Total ScoreTS
Assesses how stable and goal-oriented a person’s fixed emotional mindset is, indicating their typical life strategy and sense of well-being.
example score5/7
5/7Average rangeexample score
1 – 2Loser range
3 – 5Average range
6 – 7Winner range
A score of 5 falls in the Average range, suggesting a generally stable emotional background with a tendency to play it safe and avoid unnecessary risk.
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Therapy and coaching clients
41%OF USERS
People already working with a therapist or coach take it to quickly map their emotional baseline and decide what to focus on next.
Stressed or burnt-out adults
34%OF USERS
People feeling chronically tired, irritable, or low take it to understand how fixed their emotional attitude has become.
Self-reflection seekers
25%OF USERS
People interested in personal growth use it as a structured check-in to see whether their inner mindset tends toward hopeful, neutral, or defeated.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Shaded area — where most people score
Dot — the average
You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test
Overall AssessmentOA
You?
Average4.6
Typical rangeTypical3.5 – 5.7
Possible1 – 7
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

You are presented with a series of questions and statements. Please respond by selecting one of the seven response options that best applies to you. Please respond promptly and do not spend excessive time considering your answers.
    • Always; definitely yes; very true
    • Almost always; yes; true
    • Often; rather yes; rather true
    • Uncertain
    • Rarely; rather no; not true
    • Almost never; no; not true
    • Never; definitely no; completely untrue
    • Always; definitely yes; very true
    • Almost always; yes; true
    • Often; rather yes; rather true
    • Uncertain
    • Rarely; rather no; not true
    • Almost never; no; not true
    • Never; definitely no; completely untrue
    • Always, absolutely yes, very true
    • Almost always, yes, true
    • Often, rather yes, rather true
    • Uncertain
    • Rarely, rather no, not true
    • Almost never, no, not true
    • Never, absolutely not, completely untrue
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

Fixed Emotional Set Level Test - Description and methodology of the test

transactional analysis

People who want to examine how they approach opportunities, responsibility, relationships, and setbacks can use the Fixed Emotional Set Level Test as a structured self-report exercise. Its single total score offers a broad snapshot of the respondent's current emotional set profile, while the questions connect optimism, adaptability, openness, and enjoyment.

What This Assessment Explores

The questionnaire samples achievement, responsibility, relationships, pleasure, worry, and the future rather than a single mood. These themes show how emotional set level appears in planning, persistence, openness, and constructive meaning.

Total Score is 1-7 and is the sole displayed scale, reflecting fixed emotional set, well-being, and life strategies. It places respondents on an imaginary nine-level ladder of underachievers, average performers, and achievers, each with three sublevels: underachievers tend toward pessimism and responsibility avoidance; average performers are satisfied with little and avoid risk; achievers attain goals and show flexibility. The bands are Loser range 1-2, Average range 3-5, and Winner range 6-7.

The questions sample these connected themes:

  • Goal pursuit and responsibility show planning, persistence, and ownership of decisions.
  • Openness and relationships indicate flexibility, connection, and conflict patterns.
  • Well-being themes capture enjoyment, hope, and constructive meaning in events.

Methodology and Scientific Basis

Each item is a first-person statement rated on seven ordered choices, from Always or definitely true through an uncertain midpoint to Never or completely untrue. The items cover planning, persistence, and responsibility alongside expecting failure, delaying decisions, or hoping for a miracle. Respondents therefore place each statement on a frequency-and-agreement continuum.

The item themes are conceptually consistent with Makarov and Makarova's 2002 transactional-analysis work; this online questionnaire is not that published instrument or a standardized adaptation. Transactional analysis provides a framework for considering stable attitudes, personal agency, and interpersonal behavior, while Berne and Knapp clarify related concepts without establishing this version's standardization.

The displayed fixed emotional set score is a single result with three descriptive bands; no item-weighting or norming rule is stated for this online score. Because it is a self-report snapshot, current circumstances, self-awareness, and self-presentation can influence the result; it describes the respondent's present perspective rather than measuring change over time.

Author: Paul Ekman
Literature:
  • Makarov, Viktor V., and Galina A. Makarova. Transactional Analysis: Eastern Version. Moscow: Academic Project and Professional Psychotherapeutic League, 2002. 496 pp. ISBN 5-8291-0281-1; 5-94250-014-2.
  • Makarov, Viktor V. Psychology of Every Day and All Life. Moscow: Professional Psychotherapeutic League, 2001. 187 pp. ISBN 5-9292-0045-9.
  • Berne, Eric. Transactional Analysis in Psychotherapy: A Systematic Individual and Social Psychiatry. New York: Random House, 1961.
  • Knapp, Barton W. Transactional Analysis: A Theory and Context for an Integrated Approach to Psychotherapy. Transactional Analysis Journal, 29(2), 92-95, 1999. 10.1177/036215379902900202.

Updated:

Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment