Professional Self-Realization Type and Level Questionnaire Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Yes
- Partly true
- No
- Yes
- Partly true
- No
- Yes
- Partly true
- No
Professional Self-Realization Type and Level Questionnaire Test - Description and methodology of the test
People considering a change of direction, evaluating their current work, or trying to understand stalled career progress may use the Professional Self-Realization Type and Level Questionnaire Test to examine a work-related decision or concern. This professional self-realization questionnaire frames career development as a personal process rather than a single job outcome. The result offers a structured profile for reflection on confidence, motivation, satisfaction, and next steps.
What This Assessment Explores
Rather than measuring one trait, the questionnaire links work outcomes with the resources and meanings supporting them. The statements address achievement, professional knowledge, satisfaction, recognition, resilience, self-regulation, and vocational uncertainty. This professional self-realization test suits people considering role fit or career development.
The displayed profile contains four indicators:
- Phenomenological Component (0-34) measures career outcomes, professionalism, and job satisfaction: Low expression 0-10, Moderate expression 11-22, High expression 23-34.
- Resource Component (0-34) measures energy, self-awareness, self-regulation, and competency appraisal: Low resources 0-10, Moderate resources 11-22, High resources 23-34.
- Goal Component (0-34) measures goal-value-motive coherence: Low clarity 0-10, Moderate clarity 11-22, High clarity 23-34.
- Professional Self-Realization Level (0-102) reflects realized potential, decision confidence, professional identification, and value realization: Low 0-25, Moderate 26-77, High 78-102.
Together, these indicators show the pattern of reported outcomes, available resources, and goal clarity across the profile.
Methodology and Evidence Base
Responses are three-way: usually Yes, a middle option such as Partly true or Somewhat true, and No; some choices use 1-3. The statements cover strengths, doubts, satisfaction, pressure, and work habits. Answers are useful when they describe personal experience rather than an idealized image.
The questionnaire's professional self-realization assessment reports component totals and an overall level. Component and overall ranges are displayed, but how individual answers contribute to those totals is unspecified; points should not be inferred from the ranges.
The questionnaire aligns conceptually with Gavrilova's 2015 Type and Level of Professional Self-Realization methodology, but is not presented as its adaptation. Its construct is consistent with Korostyleva’s professional self-realization work and Super’s life-span, life-space career framework. These sources support the framework but do not establish that this online presentation reproduces norms or validation.
Interpret the profile as a snapshot shaped by current circumstances and response style. A high total may coexist with a weaker component, while a moderate result can identify an area for reflection rather than a fixed limitation. It is a self-report reflection tool, not a clinical diagnosis.
- Gavrilova, E. A. (2015). Psychodiagnostic Methodology "Type and Level of Professional Self-Realization": Development, Description, and Psychometrics. Vestnik of Tver State University. Series: Pedagogy and Psychology, no. 3, pp. 19-34.
- Korostyleva, L. A. (2005). Psychology of Personality Self-Realization: Difficulties in the Professional Sphere. Saint Petersburg: Rech.
- Super, D. E. (1980). A Life-Span, Life-Space Approach to Career Development. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 16(3), 282-298. 10.1016/0001-8791(80)90056-1