Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
arrange

Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES) Test

Take the online Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES) Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES) Test here. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
With 17 questions taking about four minutes, the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES) Test explores how energized, enthusiastic, and immersed you feel in your work. Your result highlights these three aspects of engagement, helping you reflect on your current work experience and identify patterns in your motivation, focus, and persistence.
Questions: 174 minutes
Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES): agreement scale card
October 2, 2025October 2, 2025Material has been updatedOctober 2, 2025Material has been published
37,074 views
2,674 completions
2,202 likes
Daniel HallPsychologist · Test reviewer
2,202 likes
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

AbsorptionA
Measures how fully a person becomes immersed and focused in their work, including a sense of flow and reduced awareness of time.
example score4/6
4/6Moderate absorptionexample score
0 – 2Low absorption
3 – 4Moderate absorption
5 – 6High absorption
A score of 4 indicates moderate absorption, suggesting they often feel focused and engaged in tasks, though the full flow state may not be consistent.
EnthusiasmE
Measures how strongly a person feels enthusiastic, proud, and psychologically connected to their work.
example score3/6
3/6Moderateexample score
0 – 2Low
3 – 4Moderate
5 – 6High
A score of 3 suggests a moderate level of enthusiasm, indicating some sense of meaning and pride in the work with room to strengthen commitment and inspiration.
VigorV
Energy measures how much vigor and mental stamina a person brings to work, including readiness to invest effort and persist under difficulty.
example score4/6
4/6Moderate energyexample score
0 – 2Low energy
3 – 4Moderate energy
5 – 6High energy
A score of 4 indicates moderate energy, suggesting generally good work capacity and persistence with some room to strengthen reserves and resilience.
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

HR and People Ops
41%OF USERS
They use it to gauge team energy and motivation, spot engagement risks early, and shape targeted improvements.
Team Leads and Managers
34%OF USERS
They take it to understand how their team experiences day-to-day work and where focus or enthusiasm is slipping.
Employees and Job Seekers
25%OF USERS
They use it for self-checks on burnout risk and to decide what changes could make work feel more engaging.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Shaded area — where most people score
Dot — the average
You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test
PreoccupationP
You?
Average4.2
Typical rangeTypical3.4 – 5.1
Possible0 – 6
EnthusiasmE
You?
Average4.2
Typical rangeTypical3.1 – 5.2
Possible0 – 6
EnergyE
You?
Average2.2
Typical rangeTypical1.3 – 3.2
Possible0 – 6
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

Please indicate how often you experience the feelings and states listed below. For each statement, select one response that best reflects the frequency of your thoughts and experiences.
    • Never
    • Very rarely
    • Rarely
    • Sometimes
    • Often
    • Very often
    • Every day
    • Never
    • Very rarely
    • Rarely
    • Sometimes
    • Often
    • Very often
    • Every day
    • Never
    • Very rarely
    • Rarely
    • Sometimes
    • Often
    • Very often
    • Every day
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES) Test - Description and methodology of the test

arrange
passion

People reflecting on how work currently feels may use the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES) Test to organize experiences of energy, meaning, and immersion. A work engagement questionnaire like this is intended for employees and other working adults who want a clearer profile of motivation, concentration, and persistence. Comparing the dimensions can help a worker see which aspects of work currently feel most sustainable or demanding.

What Work Engagement Involves

Work engagement describes a positive relationship with one’s job, involving energy, connection, persistence, pride, and involvement. The items ask about meaningful work, enthusiasm, sustained effort, concentration, enjoyment, and difficulty disengaging. An employee engagement assessment can show whether experience is marked more by depleted energy, reduced meaning, limited immersion, or a stronger combination.

The three result dimensions are:

  • Absorption (0-6) reflects concentration, immersion, enjoyment, and altered time awareness; Low absorption 0-2, Moderate absorption 3-4, and High absorption 5-6.
  • Enthusiasm (0-6) reflects meaning, inspiration, pride, and connection with the job; Low 0-2, Moderate 3-4, and High 5-6.
  • Vigor (0-6) reflects energy, effort, and persistence during difficulty; Low energy 0-2, Moderate energy 3-4, and High energy 5-6.

Together, the profile shows whether engagement is even or concentrated in one area. It describes current work-related tendencies, not a permanent trait.

Methodology and Evidence

Each item uses seven frequency choices, from Never to Every day. It asks how often experiences occur rather than whether the respondent agrees with a description. Current workload can affect responses, so answer for a usual work pattern.

Responses are grouped into three dimensions, and the online result presents them as a profile in displayed categories. Response choices run from 1 to 7, while displayed scores run from 0 to 6; the questionnaire’s item-to-score conversion is not documented, so read the profile descriptively rather than reconstructing an unreported formula.

The original UWES manual by Schaufeli and Bakker and related studies provide a conceptual comparison and evidence for the source construct. Confirmatory-factor, multisample, and longitudinal studies support treating engagement as related but distinguishable dimensions. Those sources do not validate this online questionnaire, its scoring, or its scale labels; it is conceptually consistent with the UWES, not the published scale itself.

For reflection, this work engagement self-assessment highlights motivation, immersion, and stamina. Self-report varies with mood, workload, expectations, and self-awareness, so read its profile in context.

Author: A. B. Bakker, W.B. Schaufeli
Literature:
  • Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). UWES. Utrecht Work Engagement Scale. Preliminary Manual (Version 1.1). Occupational Health Psychology Unit, Utrecht University.
  • Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The Measurement of Engagement and Burnout: A Two Sample Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71-92. 10.1023/A:1015630930326
  • Seppälä, P., Mauno, S., Feldt, T., Hakanen, J., Kinnunen, U., Tolvanen, A., & Schaufeli, W. (2009). The Construct Validity of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale: Multisample and Longitudinal Evidence. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10(4), 459-481. 10.1007/s10902-008-9100-y

Updated:

Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment