Humor Orientation Self-Assessment Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Never
- Rarely
- Sometimes
- Often
- Always
- Never
- Rarely
- Sometimes
- Often
- Always
- Never
- Rarely
- Sometimes
- Often
- Always
Humor Orientation Self-Assessment Test - Description and methodology of the test
People who want to understand how humor operates in their relationships, mood, and responses to setbacks may use the Humor Orientation Self-Assessment Test as a structured starting point. This humor orientation assessment can help a reader examine responses that arise in everyday interactions and setbacks. The resulting scores can be considered alongside a person's intentions, context, and relationships.
What This Assessment Explores
Responses focus on how a person uses humor rather than on comedic skill. Items address self-irony, amusement in setbacks, interpreting humor, and teasing or ridiculing others. This humor style assessment can show whether humor is self-directed, used to make sense of problems, or aimed at social targets.
The three displayed dimensions are:
- Toward Others (0-40) measures humor directed at others; Low 0-13, Moderate 14-26, and High 27-40 describe the shown bands.
- Problem-Focused (0-40) measures humor used to cope with or make sense of difficulties; Low use 0-13, Moderate use 14-26, and High use 27-40 are the displayed bands.
- Self-Directed (0-40) measures humor aimed at oneself; Low self-directed humor 0-13, Moderate self-directed humor 14-26, and High self-directed humor 27-40 are the displayed bands.
Together, the profile describes humor patterns, not objective funniness, and may prompt reflection on mood, perspective, and social effects.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each statement is rated from Never to Always on a five-point frequency scale. The items move among self-directed reactions, interpretations of humor, and interpersonal behavior, while the online scoring groups answers into the three dimensions. Because no item-level weighting or reverse-scoring rule is stated, the ranges do not show how each individual response contributes.
The questionnaire is conceptually consistent with the Humor Direction Self-Assessment Test (Dombrovskaya, 2014), the closest framework for its focus on humor's direction and function. Martin's integrative model and the Humor Styles Questionnaire (Martin et al., 2003) support distinguishing humor by target and use, but this questionnaire is not presented as a direct adaptation or validation of those works. Martin's 2007 account supplies broader context for humor, coping, and well-being.
In this questionnaire, the Problem-Focused dimension assesses humor coping strategies in difficult situations; the online version does not report population norms, reliability estimates, or clinical cutoffs, so its bands should be read descriptively. Current mood, self-awareness, and concern about social impression can shape self-report, so results are best read as context-sensitive tendencies rather than a diagnosis.
- Dombrovskaya, Iolanta S. Humor in the Context of Development. Moscow: Neformat, 2014. 280 pp.
- Martin, Rod A. The Psychology of Humor: An Integrative Approach. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Academic Press, 2007. 446 pp. ISBN 9780123725646.
- Martin, Rod A., Patricia Puhlik-Doris, Gwen Larsen, Jeanette Gray, and Kelly Weir. Individual Differences in Uses of Humor and Their Relation to Psychological Well-Being: Development of the Humor Styles Questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(1), 48-75, 2003. 10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00534-2
Updated: