Suicide Risk Factors Questionnaire Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Yes
- No
- Yes
- No
- Yes
- No
Suicide Risk Factors Questionnaire Test - Description and methodology of the test
People considering this questionnaire may want a structured way to examine emotional strain, hopelessness, interpersonal pressure, and reactions to extreme situations. The Suicide Risk Factors Questionnaire Test is intended for self-reflection about patterns linked with vulnerability or resilience. By organizing concerns, this questionnaire about suicide risk gives diffuse experiences a clearer starting point for reflection or discussion. Results describe current reported tendencies rather than a fixed identity.
What This Assessment Explores
Questions address relationships, loneliness, jealousy, loss, self-evaluation, shame, work, finances, hopelessness, and severe stress. Some statements ask about positive expectations or the absence of a problem, so answer each Yes/No item by its wording.
The two displayed scales are:
- Resilience to Psychoemotional Stress (0-12) reflects capacity to cope with psychoemotional stress. Low resistance is 0-4; Average resistance is 5-8 and indicates selective affective reactivity to different stimuli; High resistance is 9-12.
- Suicidal Reactivity Proneness (0-25) reflects severity of proneness to suicidal reactions. Low is 0-4; Moderate is 5-9; Elevated is 10-25. The catalogue notes that average scores may indicate potential risk that can increase in stressful or conflict situations.
Together, the displayed scales show coping capacity and suicidal reactivity, while the question themes place factors associated with suicide risk in context without reducing the person to either result.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Methodologically, this online suicide risk questionnaire uses binary self-report: each item asks whether a situation, thought, or tendency applies, with Yes and No choices. The format records a binary response rather than frequency or intensity, and the items span affective stress, interpersonal loss, self-criticism, health and legal fears, occupational and financial pressure, and views of life’s value. The questionnaire reports two scale scores and places them in the displayed result bands; its item weighting and calculation method are not specified. The ranges should therefore not be reverse-engineered into a probability.
The questionnaire is conceptually consistent with Joiner’s interpersonal theory and Shneidman’s concept of psychache; this relationship provides context for questions about disconnection, loss, unbearable psychological pain, and extreme reactions, not evidence that either framework standardized the online form.
Population norms and clinical validation are not stated for the online form, and its standardization status is not established. Scores can be influenced by current mood, context, honesty, and self-awareness. A single band cannot establish imminent danger or explain causation.
- Yunatskevich, Petr Ivanovich. (2018). Fundamentals of Military Suicidology. St. Petersburg: AEST Institute of Suicidology. 120 pp. ISBN 5-7199-0258-9.
- Joiner, Thomas E. (2005). Why People Die by Suicide. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 276 pp. 10.2307/j.ctvjghv2f.
- Shneidman, Edwin S. (1993). Suicide as psychache. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 181(3), 145-147. 10.1097/00005053-199303000-00001.
Updated: