Temperament Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- I get upset about trivial matters
- Only serious events concern me
- I like to keep busy with activities or work.
- I focus on enjoying myself.
- I do nothing.
- I get upset and excited easily
- I usually take things as they are
Temperament Test - Description and methodology of the test
For readers who want to understand their habitual style of reacting, acting, and adapting, the temperament test offers a compact profile of everyday tendencies. It suits self-reflection when broad impressions about personality feel too vague. As a temperament quiz, it can help connect emotional responses, decision-making, persistence, and flexibility with a clearer pattern.
What This Assessment Explores
At its core, the questionnaire treats temperament as interacting tendencies. Readers expecting a four temperaments test should note that it uses continuous dimensions. Items cover emotional sensitivity, lingering impressions, activity, planning, persistence, routine, and adaptation.
The three displayed scales and their bands are:
- Primary-Secondary (9-90) shows whether impressions shift quickly or linger: More Primary 9-45, Balanced 46-54, and More Secondary 55-90.
- Activity (9-90) reflects the need for action and implementation: Lower activity 9-45, Moderate activity 46-54, and Higher activity 55-90; low scores can indicate contemplation, not laziness.
- Emotionality (9-90) reflects emotional sensitivity and intensity: Low 9-45, Moderate 46-54, and High 55-90.
Together, the profile describes patterns in responding to change, effort, and emotional events.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Methodologically, the items use brief self-report contrasts. Most ask the respondent to choose between descriptions of everyday reactions; some offer a third option or a middle position. This format captures a preferred tendency, so results depend on honest self-observation and current context.
Selected responses are converted into three dimension totals and placed in the displayed bands. The ranges do not reveal how many points an answer contributes, so they should not be reverse-engineered. The profile is not a 4 personality types test in the strict categorical sense; different tendencies can combine in one person.
Its framework is conceptually consistent with the Heymans-Wiersma temperament dimensions (1906-1918), which connect the three dimensions as related aspects of temperament. Heymans’s later synthesis, Biesheuvel’s analysis, and van der Werff’s review add context, but do not establish that this online form is the original instrument or a standardized adaptation.
In practice, it is most useful for noticing patterns that vary with stress, habits, and mood. The cited publications do not establish norms, reliability, or diagnostic validity for this questionnaire, so its profile supports self-reflection rather than a clinical conclusion.
- Heymans, G., and Wiersma, E. (1906-1918). Contributions to Special Psychology Based on a Large-Scale Investigation. Zeitschrift für Psychologie und Physiologie der Sinnesorgane and Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 42, 81-127, 258-301; 43, 321-373; 45, 1-42; 46, 321-333; 49, 414-439; 51, 1-72; 62, 1-59; 80, 76-89. Leipzig: J. A. Barth.
- Heymans, G. (1929). Introduction to Special Psychology. 2 vols. Haarlem: F. Bohn.
- Biesheuvel, Simon. (1933). The Nature of Temperament: A Study of Some Fundamental Factors. PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh.
- van der Werff, J. J. (1985). Heymans' Temperamental Dimensions in Personality Research. Journal of Research in Personality, 19(3), 279-287. 10.1016/0092-6566(85)90019-4
Updated: