Temporal Modalities of Life Realization Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Completely untrue
- Untrue
- Neutral
- True
- Completely true
- Completely untrue
- Untrue
- Neutral
- True
- Completely true
- Completely false
- False
- Neutral
- True
- Completely true
Temporal Modalities of Life Realization Test - Description and methodology of the test
For people who want to understand how they inhabit time, the Temporal Modalities of Life Realization Test offers a structured look at the meaning they give to past experience, present activity, and future possibility. It can be especially useful as a time perspective assessment, connecting everyday choices with planning, reflection, uncertainty, and the felt quality of current life.
What This Assessment Explores
The questionnaire covers present enjoyment, goals, daily schedules, past memories, alternatives, and future uncertainty. This subjective time perception measure indicates whether experience feels integrated, structured, or past- or future-focused.
The three dimensions are:
- Balance of Modal Evaluations (-18-18) shows coherence and authenticity of present-time perception: Imbalanced (-18--1.6), Near-balanced (-1.6-5.3), or Highly balanced (5.4-18).
- Rationalization of Time Periods of Life Realization (-26-26) shows meaningful time structure; higher scores indicate planning, past integration, and realistic time use. Bands: Less structured (-26--0.6), Transitional (-0.6-8.5), and Well structured (8.6-26).
- Emotional Fixation on Events (-22-22) shows emotional orientation toward time; higher scores suggest past reflection, daydreaming, and future uncertainty. Bands: Low fixation (-22--4.3), Balanced/neutral (-4.2-5.5), and High fixation (5.6-22).
Methodology and Evidence Base
Each statement uses five ordered choices, from Completely untrue or Completely false through Neutral to True or Completely true. Wording varies slightly, but each choice indicates how true the statement is for the respondent.
Responses form the three dimensions. The reported ranges and bands provide the interpretation framework, so no extra point-per-answer rule should be inferred. Taken as a time orientation questionnaire, the result is best read as a pattern across present focus, time structure, and emotional fixation.
The Temporal Modalities of Life Realization questionnaire is conceptually consistent with a related temporal instrument reported by Bredun et al. (2021), which addresses related patterns of temporal experience. The Zimbardo-Boyd model provides a related framework for past, present, and future orientation, helping situate this questionnaire’s focus on time direction. Bredun, Krasnoryadtseva, and Shcheglova’s 2018 research provides additional context for subjective time perception. The displayed ranges and bands are the interpretation categories used for this result; no point-conversion rule or population norm is specified for the Freudly questionnaire.
Self-report means current mood, memory, self-awareness, and impression management can influence the profile; it is a snapshot of perceived time orientation, not a clinical diagnosis or broader assessment.
- Bredun, E. V., Shcheglova, E. A., Smeshko, E. V., & Shmer, T. A. (2021). Diagnostic Capabilities of "Temporal Modality of Life Fulfilment" Questionnaire. Siberian Journal of Psychology, 82, 174-190. 10.17223/17267080/82/10
- Bredun, E. V., Krasnoryadtseva, O. M., & Shcheglova, E. A. (2018). Typological Features of Subjective Time Perception in the Context of Chronotopical Human Life. Siberian Journal of Psychology, 68, 32-45. 10.17223/17267080/68/2
- Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting Time in Perspective: A Valid, Reliable Individual-Differences Metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1271-1288. 10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1271
Updated: