Learning Interest and Academic Self-Esteem Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Do not like at all
- Do not like
- Neither like nor dislike
- Like
- Like very much
- Do not like it at all
- Do not like it
- Neither like nor dislike
- Like it
- Like it very much
- I do not like it at all
- I do not like it
- Somewhat
- I like it
- I like it very much
Learning Interest and Academic Self-Esteem Test - Description and methodology of the test
People reflecting on their own learning may use the Learning Interest and Academic Self-Esteem Test to examine a practical question: which school experiences feel inviting, and where might perceived difficulty or low confidence be shaping participation. Its learning motivation test format organizes those reflections across familiar academic and activity contexts, helping respondents notice patterns worth considering when choosing study strategies.
What This Assessment Explores
Perceived academic ability meets motivation in the academic self-esteem test.
Six dimensions separate enjoyment from performance; higher means interest or confidence, lower means less:
- Motivation for Physical Education (6-30) reflects interest. Low motivation 6-14; Moderate motivation 15-22; High motivation 23-30.
- Motivation to Study Natural Sciences (6-30) reflects subject interest. Low motivation 6-14; Moderate motivation 15-22; High motivation 23-30.
- Motivation to Learn the Russian Language (6-30) reflects subject interest. Low motivation 6-13; Moderate motivation 14-22; High motivation 23-30.
- Motivation to Study Mathematics (6-30) reflects subject interest. Low 6-13; Moderate 14-22; High 23-30.
- Academic Self-Esteem (12-60) reflects appraisal. Low 12-27; Moderate 28-43; High 44-60.
- Learning Interest (12-60) reflects motivation. Low 12-27; Moderate 28-43; High 44-60.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Five ordered options move from lower to higher liking or self-rated ability; wording varies by item. Early items ask about liking mathematics, reading and writing, science, language, team games, competitions, and physical education; later items ask how well respondents think they perform in matching areas.
Spinath and colleagues (2006) discuss self-perceived ability and intrinsic value; Kovas and colleagues (2015) describe subject variation in learning motivation. This questionnaire is conceptually consistent with those distinctions, not an adaptation of either study.
The six displayed scales use descriptive bands: higher results indicate more favorable interest, motivation, or confidence, but do not explain its cause. The learning interest assessment is best used to compare personal tendencies.
These bands have no established normative interpretation for this online questionnaire. Mood, classroom experiences, and self-awareness can influence answers, so results are snapshots of present attitudes, not fixed measures of ability or achievement.
- Twins Early Development Study. (2003-2004). 9 Year Study Measures. TEDS Data Dictionary.
- Spinath, B., Spinath, F. M., Harlaar, N., & Plomin, R. (2006). Predicting school achievement from general cognitive ability, self-perceived ability, and intrinsic value. Intelligence, 34(4), 363-374. 10.1016/j.intell.2005.11.004
- Kovas, Y., Garon-Carrier, G., Boivin, M., Petrill, S. A., Plomin, R., Malykh, S. B., et al. (2015). Why children differ in motivation to learn: Insights from over 13,000 twins from 6 countries. Personality and Individual Differences, 80, 51-63. 10.1016/j.paid.2015.02.006
Updated: