Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
metacognition

Metacognitive Processes Intensity Scale Test

Take the online Metacognitive Processes Intensity Scale Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Metacognitive Processes Intensity Scale Testhere. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
See how well you monitor and manage your thinking in about 6 minutes. Get clear results across key areas to target coaching, boost decisions, and sharpen information handling.
Start Online Test
Questions: 316 minutes
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
October 2, 2025
Material has been published
33,053 views
2,326 completions
1,953 likes
Verified by Daniel Hall
Psychologist with 25 years of experience
Share
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score
170/217
Metacognitive Process Intensity (MPI)
Measures how strongly a person can monitor, evaluate, and regulate their own thinking processes.
Low
Moderate
High
3193: Low | 94155: Moderate | 156217: High
A score of 170 falls in the High range, suggesting well-developed metacognitive skills such as planning, reflection, and self-regulation during thinking and decision-making.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Managers and team leads
41%OF USERS
They take it to understand how well they plan, monitor, and adjust their thinking while making decisions and leading others.
Students and early-career pros
34%OF USERS
They use it to spot strengths and gaps in learning strategies, focus, and self-checking to improve study and work performance.
Psychologists and HR specialists
25%OF USERS
They take it to assess metacognitive skills for coaching, selection, or development programs and to track progress over time.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
The degree of metacognitive process expression (Tdompe)
The degree of metacognitive process expression (Tdompe)
Average
86.2
Normal range
55.6116.8
min.
31
max.
217
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

    • Completely untrue
    • Almost certain this is untrue
    • Rather untrue than true
    • Not sure
    • Rather true than untrue
    • Almost certain this is true
    • Completely true
    • Does not apply at all
    • Almost sure it does not apply
    • Applies more negatively than positively
    • Not sure
    • Applies more positively than negatively
    • Almost sure it applies
    • Applies completely
    • Does not apply at all
    • Almost certainly does not apply
    • Somewhat does not apply rather than applies
    • Not sure
    • Somewhat applies rather than does not apply
    • Almost certainly applies
    • Completely applies
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment
Degree of Metacognitive Processes Expression Test

Metacognitive Processes Intensity Scale Test - Symptoms and Signs

metacognition

This self-report measure assesses the intensity of metacognitive processes involved in monitoring, evaluating, and regulating one’s thinking and information processing. The Metacognitive Processes Intensity Scale provides a brief profile of perceived metacognitive activity across multiple domains relevant to cognitive self-regulation (Wells).

It contains 31 items and typically takes about 6 minutes to complete. Results are intended to support descriptive assessment of individual differences in metacognitive processing intensity; the Metacognitive Processes Intensity Scale may be used in clinical, coaching, or research contexts as an adjunct to broader evaluation, with interpretation guided by the respondent’s context and other assessment data.

Author: Adrian F. Wells
Literature: Flavell, J. H. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist. 1979.; Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 1994.; Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation. Academic Press. 1990.
Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment