Internal Aggression Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Yes
- No
- Yes
- No
- Yes
- No
Internal Aggression Test - Description and methodology of the test
For readers who want to understand anger that is turned inward rather than openly expressed, the Internal Aggression Test offers a focused self-report profile. The focus on anger held inward can clarify how concealed hurt, self-criticism, irritability, and bodily tension may appear together. It is most useful when answers describe a recurring personal pattern instead of one unusually stressful moment.
What This Assessment Explores
The questionnaire examines internal aggressiveness as a tendency to suppress or control anger. Items address unspoken hurt, guilt, self-directed anger, resentment, conflict, rejection, mood changes, fatigue, and physical discomfort. References to violence provide context, not proof of one cause.
For someone trying to understand hidden anger, the result indicates how strongly this inward pattern may appear. The displayed scale is Level of Internal Aggressiveness (0-40): Low (0-19), Moderate (20-29), or High (30-40). Lower scores may reflect self-control or difficulty expressing anger; higher scores suggest more pronounced internal aggression and may be associated with inner tension and psychological discomfort.
The main themes are:
- Indirect management of anger shows how feelings may be handled without direct expression.
- Self-criticism and guilt show how anger may turn inward.
- Interpersonal friction reflects conflict, irritation, or rejection.
- Emotional strain captures distress linked with unresolved hurt.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Yes-or-no items ask whether each statement fits, and the questionnaire presents one overall scale rather than separate subscales. It does not state how each yes-or-no response contributes to that score, so individual answers are not standalone findings; the displayed bands should guide interpretation.
STAXI-2 provides a broader published framework for anger experience and expression. This questionnaire is not presented as an adaptation of it, and that instrument does not directly validate this questionnaire, its scoring, or its norms.
Interpretation is strongest when the result is read as a pattern of anger suppression alongside recent stress, relationships, sleep, physical symptoms, and usual emotional communication. A response can reflect temporary circumstances, limited self-awareness, or reluctance to disclose sensitive experiences.
This self-report reflection tool has no stated clinical norms or demonstrated reliability estimate, so its result is one perspective rather than a diagnostic conclusion.
- Dayhoff, S. A. (2000). Diagonally-Parked in a Parallel Universe: Working Through Social Anxiety. Placitas, NM: Effectiveness-Plus Publications.
- Havrylets, Y. D., Tukaiev, S. V., Rizun, V. V., & Makarchuk, M. Y. (2013). Comparative Analysis of the Effects of Negative and Neutral TV News Stories. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 82, 421-425. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.286
- Spielberger, C. D. (1999). STAXI-2: State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory-2: Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Updated: