Internet Addiction Test
How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Very rarely
- Sometimes
- Often
- Very often
- Always
- Very rarely
- Sometimes
- Often
- Very often
- Always
- Very rarely
- Sometimes
- Often
- Very often
- Always
Internet Addiction Test - Description and methodology of the test
Readers unsure whether online habits have become difficult to manage can use the Internet Addiction Test to examine that concern in a structured way. It is intended for people reviewing their own behavior and considering whether a recurring pattern deserves attention or a change in boundaries. The format works as an internet addiction questionnaire, helping turn a vague sense of overuse into a result to reflect on.
What This Assessment Explores
Questions cover loss of control and effects on daily functioning: work, duties, sleep, relationships, preoccupation, concealment, emotional reliance, and attempts to cut down.
The Internet Addiction Scale ranges from 20-100 and assesses involvement in internet-related activities and potential impact on daily functioning. Its bands are No signs (20-49), Significant influence (50-79), and Pronounced dependence (80-100). Low scores suggest no signs; 50-79 indicates significant impact; 80-100 is described as marked addiction requiring professional attention. For readers concerned about problematic internet use, it organizes concerns for reflection.
These are the item themes:
- Loss of control shows whether sessions exceed intention or resisting them proves difficult.
- Functional impact shows whether use interferes with work, duties, relationships, or sleep.
- Preoccupation and emotional reliance show whether online access occupies attention or changes mood.
- Social effects show whether use displaces in-person contact or creates conflict.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
The response format asks how often each situation occurs, using five choices from very rarely or rarely to always. Items address behavior and consequences, so the result reflects repeated self-report rather than minutes online alone. Responses are summarized on the displayed scale and interpreted through its bands.
Kimberly Young's published IAT supplies the relevant framework of loss of control, salience, withdrawal-like reactions, and interference with daily life. Widyanto and McMurran examined that published instrument's psychometric properties, while Widyanto, Griffiths, and Brunsden compared it with another problem scale and self-diagnosis. This online questionnaire is conceptually consistent with Young's instrument, but those studies do not validate this specific online version.
When the result is used for internet addiction screening, read it alongside current stress, sleep, mood, work demands, and relationship conflict, all of which can shape self-report. The online score is a structured self-report result, not a standardized diagnostic measure, so it cannot establish a disorder or explain its cause. Honest answers and concrete examples make a persistent pattern easier to interpret.
- Widyanto, L., & McMurran, M. (2004). The Psychometric Properties of the Internet Addiction Test. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7(4), 443-450. 10.1089/cpb.2004.7.443
- Young, K. S. (1998). Caught in the Net: How to Recognize the Signs of Internet Addiction-and a Winning Strategy for Recovery. New York: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0-471-19159-9
- Widyanto, L., Griffiths, M. D., & Brunsden, V. (2011). A Psychometric Comparison of the Internet Addiction Test, the Internet-Related Problem Scale, and Self-Diagnosis. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(3), 141-149. 10.1089/cyber.2010.0151
Updated: