Volitional Organization of Personality Assessment Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Yes
- Rather yes than no
- Rather no than yes
- No
- Yes
- More often yes than no
- More often no than yes
- No
- Yes
- Rather yes than no
- Rather no than yes
- No
Volitional Organization of Personality Assessment Test - Description and methodology of the test
People who want to understand how they direct effort, manage impulses, and turn intentions into action can use the Volitional Organization of Personality Assessment Test as a structured self-reflection tool. It is suited to readers considering decision-making, persistence, emotional regulation, or meaningful goals, and it produces a profile of reported volitional qualities rather than a single judgment. The volitional organization assessment helps organize these observations for personal reflection.
What This Assessment Explores
This personality self-regulation test identifies strengths and development needs.
Dimensions include:
- Lie Scale (0-24) assesses sincerity: Reliable 0-16; Questionable sincerity 17-24.
- Independence (0-24) measures action without external support: Needs development 0-8, Sufficient 9-16, High 17-24; Self-Control (0-24) measures regulation: Needs Development 0-8, Sufficient 9-16, High 17-24.
- Perseverance (0-24) measures follow-through: Needs development 0-8, Adequate 9-16, High 17-24; Decisiveness (0-24) measures complex decisions: Low 0-8, Adequate 9-16, High 17-24.
- Activity Organization (0-24) measures planning: Needs development 0-8, Well-developed 9-16, Highly developed 17-24; Value-Meaning Organization (0-24) measures meaningful goals: Needs development 0-8, Sufficient 9-16, Well-developed 17-24.
- Volitional Organization of Personality (0-144) reflects overall volitional development: Needs strengthening 0-48, Adequate 49-96, Strong 97-144.
Methodology and Evidence Base
Each item uses four ordered responses, from Yes to No through intermediate choices such as “Rather yes than no.” The format captures degree of agreement without forcing a binary answer. Statements address hesitation, impulsivity, emotional regulation, confidence, anxiety, goal clarity, persistence, planning, and follow-through. The scoring produces separate dimensions and a general index. This volitional traits questionnaire provides a profile of volitional qualities rather than a single score.
Interpretation combines the sincerity indicator, scores, and result. A band describes the tendency represented in the answers, not its cause or a guaranteed behavior pattern. The questionnaire uses result classifications, and this version has no stated population norms or standardization.
The structure is conceptually consistent with the Volitional Organization of Personality Method; this online questionnaire is not a documented adaptation or standardized reproduction of that published method.
Because responses depend on context, self-awareness, and candor, read the profile alongside personal or professional context.
- Gutkin, M. S., Mikhalchenko, G. F., Prudilo, A. V. (2000). The methodology for studying the volitional organization of personality. In S. N. Chistyakova and T. I. Shalavina (Eds.), Your Professional Career: A Textbook for Grades 8-11 of General Education Institutions (pp. 175-182). Moscow: Prosveshchenie.
- Polyakova, O. B. (2022). Increasing self-regulation of students’ volitional sphere as a factor of professional training effectiveness. Theoretical and Experimental Psychology, 15(2), 93-109. 10.24412/2073-0861-2022-2-93-109
- Shamlyan, K. (2015). Volitional organization of personality as a subject of empirical research. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 6(2), 257-267. 10.15503/jecs20152.257.267
Updated: