Emotional Intelligence Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Strongly disagree
- Somewhat disagree
- Somewhat agree
- Strongly agree
- Completely disagree
- Rather disagree
- Rather agree
- Completely agree
- Strongly disagree
- Somewhat disagree
- Somewhat agree
- Strongly agree
Emotional Intelligence Test - Description and methodology of the test
For readers who want a focused look at emotional functioning, the Emotional Intelligence Test offers a concise self-report profile rather than a clinical evaluation. It is suited to people exploring how they notice feelings, regulate reactions, read emotional cues, and affect conversations. An emotional intelligence assessment can help organize these patterns into practical areas for reflection, including strengths that may support relationships and situations that deserve closer attention.
What This Assessment Explores
An emotional intelligence profile spans awareness, regulation, and influence.
It reports:
- Emotion Self-Management (0-8) reflects self-regulation: Low regulation 0-2; Moderate regulation 3-5; High regulation 6-8.
- Understanding One's Own Emotions (0-8) reflects self-awareness: Low awareness 0-2; Moderate awareness 3-5; High awareness 6-8.
- Managing Others' Emotions (0-8) reflects influence: Limited influence 0-2; Situational influence 3-5; Strong influence 6-8; high scores may suggest manipulation.
- Understanding Others' Emotions (0-8) reflects sensitivity: Low 0-2; Moderate 3-5; High 6-8.
- Intrapersonal Emotional Intelligence (4-16) reflects self-regulation: Developing 4-8; Typical 9-12; Strong 13-16.
- Interpersonal Emotional Intelligence (0-16) reflects management: Developing 0-5; Adequate 6-11; Strong 12-16.
- Overall Emotional Intelligence (8-32) reflects both: Lower EI 8-16; Moderate EI 17-24; Higher EI 25-32.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each statement uses a four-point agreement scale, from disagreement to agreement. The sample includes direct and negatively worded items, so agreement is interpreted according to the ability measured rather than as a uniformly positive signal.
Scores are grouped into four abilities and three composite indices. The displayed bands describe levels for this questionnaire, not universal clinical cutoffs, while an emotional intelligence questionnaire captures reported tendencies rather than every response in daily life.
The closest evidence is EmIn short form (Pankratova et al., 2022), related to Lyusin's EmIn Questionnaire (2006). This online form is conceptually consistent with those dimensions, not a claim that it is the published instrument or carries its standardization. Its broader theoretical context aligns with Mayer, Salovey, and Caruso's model of perceiving, understanding, and managing emotion.
Current mood, memory, self-awareness, and social desirability can affect results. Treat the profile as a structured snapshot for reflection, with important conclusions requiring context beyond one self-report score.
- Pankratova, A. A., Kornienko, D. S., & Lyusin, D. V. (2022). Short Form of the EmIn Questionnaire. Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 19(4), 822-834. 10.17323/1813-8918-2022-4-822-834 (in Russian).
- Lyusin, D. V. (2006). A New Method for Measuring Emotional Intelligence: The EmIn Questionnaire. Psychological Diagnostics, 4, 3-22 (in Russian).
- Mayer, J. D., Salovey, P., & Caruso, D. R. (2004). Emotional Intelligence: Theory, Findings, and Implications. Psychological Inquiry, 15(3), 197-215. 10.1207/s15327965pli1503_02
Updated: