Self-Attitude Questionnaire Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Agree
- Disagree
- Agree
- Disagree
- Agree
- Disagree
Self-Attitude Questionnaire Test - Description and methodology of the test
People who want a structured look at how they evaluate, understand, and direct themselves may find the Self-Attitude Questionnaire Test useful. Used as a self-attitude assessment, it helps organize recurring self-criticism, uncertainty about personal abilities, or expectations of others’ reactions. The result offers a multidimensional profile rather than a single verdict about personality or wellbeing.
What This Assessment Explores
Together, the answers form a self-attitude profile covering self-evaluation, autonomy, inner experience, and expected reactions from others. The displayed dimensions are:
- Self-Liking (0-100), Self-Confidence (0-100), and Self-Respect (0-100) use Low 0-39, Moderate 40-69, High 70-100; they indicate self-acceptance, ability, strength, and control.
- Expected Attitude (0-100) uses Negative expectations 0-39, Mixed expectations 40-69, Positive expectations 70-100; Self-Understanding (0-100) uses Limited self-awareness 0-49, Developing self-understanding 50-74, Strong self-understanding 75-100; they indicate social expectations and self-knowledge.
- Self-Interest (0-100), Self-Blame (0-100), Self-Guidance (0-100), and Self-Acceptance (0-100) use Low 0-33, Moderate 34-66, High 67-100; they indicate inner interest, criticism, autonomy, and acceptance.
- Perceived Attitudes of Others (0-100) uses Expecting antipathy 0-33, Mixed expectations 34-66, Expecting support 67-100; Global Self-Attitude (0-100) uses Low 0-49, Moderate 50-74, High 75-100; they indicate expected support and overall self-evaluation.
Methodology and Evidence Base
Each statement asks for agreement or disagreement, creating a clear two-option self-report format. The items address acceptance, interest, closeness, control, self-blame, doubt, irritation, and fear of rejection. Because the response-to-score formula is not documented, the bands should be read as descriptive outputs rather than independently normed cutoffs.
Methodologically, the questionnaire is conceptually consistent with the Self-Attitude Test-Questionnaire (Pantileev & Stolin, 1988), a source instrument associated with Stolin’s model of self-consciousness. Stolin’s 1985 doctoral work supplies theoretical context for examining self-evaluation, self-relation, autonomy, and perceived attitudes from others. This online form should not be presented as a verified reproduction, translation-equivalent version, or normed administration of that published instrument.
Chanchikov (2020) connects self-attitude and emotional experiences with personality hardiness, offering related context rather than validation of this online form. The result is sensitive to current mood, honesty, social desirability, and self-awareness, so it is best used to identify themes for reflection or discussion rather than as a diagnosis or fixed personality judgment.
- Pantileev, S. R., & Stolin, V. V. (1988). Self-Attitude Test-Questionnaire. In A. A. Bodalev, I. M. Karlinskaya, V. V. Stolin, & S. R. Pantileev (Eds.), Workshop on Psychodiagnostics: Psychodiagnostic Materials (pp. 123-130). Moscow: Moscow University Press.
- Stolin, V. V. (1985). Self-Knowledge and Self-Attitude in the Structure of the Individual’s Self-Consciousness. Doctoral dissertation in psychology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 530 pp.
- Chanchikov, I. (2020). Self-Attitude and Emotional Experiences as a Factor of Personality Hardiness. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Psychology, 2(12), 98-103. 10.17721/BSP.2020.2(12).18
Updated: