Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
behavior in conflict

Nonverbal Behavior Strategies in Conflict Situations Test

Take the online Nonverbal Behavior Strategies in Conflict Situations Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Nonverbal Behavior Strategies in Conflict Situations Test here. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
In three minutes, the Nonverbal Behavior Strategies in Conflict Situations Test guides you through 15 questions about nonverbal cues and interaction choices during difficult conversations. Your results outline a profile of manipulative, defensive-insecure, competitive/confrontational, neutral-independent, and collaborative tendencies, helping you reflect on influence, withdrawal, tension, dominance, and cooperation.
Questions: 153 minutes
Nonverbal Behavior Strategies: situation and reply bubbles
October 2, 2025October 2, 2025Material has been updatedOctober 2, 2025Material has been published
33,116 views
3,184 completions
2,670 likes
Daniel HallPsychologist · Test reviewer
2,670 likes
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

ManipulativeM
Measures how often a person uses indirect or controlling nonverbal influence to gain an advantage during conflict.
example score4/9
4/9Moderateexample score
0 – 3Low
4 – 5Moderate
6 – 9High
A score of 4 indicates a moderate tendency to use subtle pressure or selective information in conflict, without it being a dominant style.
Defensive-InsecureDI
Measures the extent to which you respond to conflict with guarded, self-protective nonverbal behavior and inward withdrawal.
example score3/9
3/9Low defensivenessexample score
0 – 3Low defensiveness
4 – 5Moderate defensiveness
6 – 9High defensiveness
A score of 3 suggests low defensiveness, meaning you are generally able to stay relatively open and less self-protective in tense moments.
Competitive/ConfrontationalC
Measures the tendency to use firm, dominant nonverbal behavior to confront and compete during conflict.
example score3/9
3/9Low competitivenessexample score
0 – 3Low competitiveness
4 – 5Moderate competitiveness
6 – 9High competitiveness
A score of 3 indicates low competitiveness, suggesting you rarely rely on dominant or confrontational nonverbal signals in tense moments.
Neutral-IndependentNI
Measures the tendency to respond to conflict with detached, observant self-control rather than a clearly expressed stance.
example score4/9
4/9Moderate detachmentexample score
0 – 3Low detachment
4 – 5Moderate detachment
6 – 9High detachment
A score of 4 suggests a moderately neutral-independent style, with some distancing and careful self-control while evaluating the situation.
CollaborativeC
Measures how strongly you use a cooperative, partner-oriented nonverbal style during conflict (open engagement, direct eye contact, and peacemaking signals).
example score5/9
5/9Moderate partneringexample score
0 – 3Low partnering
4 – 6Moderate partnering
7 – 9High partnering
A score of 5 indicates a moderate tendency to use cooperative, open nonverbal behaviors in conflict while still showing room to shift into other strategies depending on the situation.
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Couples and family communicators
41%OF USERS
People in close relationships who want to recognize their silent reactions in arguments and reduce recurring tension.
Team leaders and managers
34%OF USERS
Supervisors who need to handle disagreements at work and improve how they come across nonverbally under pressure.
Coaches and psychologists
25%OF USERS
Practitioners who use quick diagnostics to spot clients’ conflict patterns and plan targeted skill-building.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Shaded area — where most people score
Dot — the average
You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test
ManipulativeM
You?
Average4
Typical rangeTypical2.6 – 5.4
Possible0 – 9
Defensive-insecureD
You?
Average6.5
Typical rangeTypical5.1 – 7.9
Possible0 – 9
Conflictual/CompetitiveC
You?
Average6.3
Typical rangeTypical4.7 – 7.9
Possible0 – 9
Neutral-independentN
You?
Average6.5
Typical rangeTypical5 – 8
Possible0 – 9
AffiliateA
You?
Average6.4
Typical rangeTypical5 – 7.8
Possible0 – 9
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

    • I clarify and choose the place, time, and situation so that I feel calm.
    • I use the time, place, and situation to achieve only my own goal.
    • I suggest meeting on neutral territory at a scheduled time, regardless of anyone’s personal preferences.
    • so that each of us can see the other freely and there are no barriers between us (a table, a chair, etc.).
    • comfortable for me—so that I can feel protected and have something to lean on.
    • such that I can see the other person clearly at all times, and I have more opportunity to influence them and more freedom to move.
    • in a corner position
    • across the table
    • on the same side of the table
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

Nonverbal Behavior Strategies in Conflict Situations Test - Description and methodology of the test

behavior in conflict

For readers who want to understand their conduct when disagreements become tense, the Nonverbal Behavior Strategies in Conflict Situations Test offers a structured look at recurring interaction choices. It is suited to self-reflection after difficult conversations, where tone, gaze, posture, distance, and timing may shape an exchange as much as spoken content. Taken together, the answers form a conflict behavior profile rather than defining a fixed identity.

What This Assessment Explores

Readers can consider nonverbal choices in tense discussions. As a conflict strategy assessment, it examines posture, gaze, distance, voice, timing, and withdrawal. The profile shows tendencies; definitions explain higher scores.

  • Manipulative (0-9) measures covert influence, pressure, withheld information, or intolerable situations; Low 0-3, Moderate 4-5, High 6-9.
  • Defensive-Insecure (0-9) measures self-protection, anxiety, and withdrawal; Low defensiveness 0-3, Moderate defensiveness 4-5, High defensiveness 6-9.
  • Competitive/Confrontational (0-9) measures rigid self-assertion, dominance, or opponent suppression; Low competitiveness 0-3, Moderate competitiveness 4-5, High competitiveness 6-9.
  • Neutral-Independent (0-9) measures uncertainty and detachment; higher results indicate tension and self-control; Low detachment 0-3, Moderate detachment 4-5, High detachment 6-9.
  • Collaborative (0-9) measures openness, cooperation, and mutual attention; Low partnering 0-3, Moderate partnering 4-6, High partnering 7-9.

Methodology and Scientific Basis

Each item presents a conflict situation with three responses involving seating, eye contact, gestures, vocal control, pressure, disagreement, or endings. Choosing the closest response makes this a situational self-report of preferred reactions, not direct observation.

The scoring display organizes answers into five profile totals. Because the questionnaire does not state how many points each option contributes, read the result as a pattern across dimensions rather than a reconstructed item formula. The displayed bands provide the questionnaire's interpretation levels for each scale.

The questionnaire is conceptually consistent with Leonov's 2022 book Conflictology, which presents conflict behavior as recognizable interaction strategies. A 2023 study by Usoskaya and Smirnova connects emotional intelligence with nonverbal behavior in conflict-tension situations, while the work of Lochman and Allen examines couples’ nonverbal communication during conflict. This nonverbal behavior test is conceptually consistent with those works, not an adaptation or validation of them.

Self-awareness, memory, and current emotional context can affect answers, so results may vary across situations. They describe tendencies in conflict communication, not a diagnosis or complete account of how someone behaves.

Author: Albert Mehrabian
Literature:
  • Leonov, Nikolai I. Psychology of Conflict: Methods for Studying Conflicts and Conflict Behavior. 3rd ed., revised and expanded. Moscow: Yurait, 2022, 264 pp. ISBN 978-5-534-12570-2.
  • Usoskaya, Darya O., and Yulia S. Smirnova. "The Relationship Between Emotional Intelligence and Nonverbal Behavior in Conflict-Tense Situations." In Social Psychology: Issues of Theory and Practice: Proceedings of the Eighth International Scientific-Practical Conference in Memory of M. Yu. Kondratyev. Moscow: Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, 2023, pp. 850-852. ISBN 978-5-94051-289-9.
  • Lochman, John E., and George Allen. "Nonverbal Communication of Couples in Conflict." Journal of Research in Personality 15, no. 2 (1981): 253-269. 10.1016/0092-6566(81)90024-6.

Updated:

Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment