Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
team climate

Pulsar Test

Take the online Pulsar Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Pulsar Testhere. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
Understand your team’s cohesion and readiness in just 2 minutes. Get a clear snapshot that predicts performance and pinpoints where to strengthen trust, communication, and alignment.
Start Online Test
Questions: 72 minutes
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
October 2, 2025
Material has been published
27,456 views
2,777 completions
2,427 likes
Verified by Daniel Hall
Psychologist with 25 years of experience
Share
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score
5/12
Organizational Structure (OS)
Organization measures how clearly roles, statuses, and formal or informal structures are defined and followed within the team.
Low structure
Developing structure
Strong structure
14: Low structure | 57: Developing structure | 812: Strong structure
A score of 5 indicates developing structure, with some role clarity and coordination present but with inconsistencies that can affect smooth collaboration.
example score
7/12
Cohesion (C)
Cohesion reflects how stable and unified interpersonal relationships are within the team, supporting consistent joint activity.
Low cohesion
Moderate cohesion
High cohesion
16: Low cohesion | 79: Moderate cohesion | 1012: High cohesion
A score of 7 indicates moderate cohesion, suggesting generally stable relationships with some areas where unity and coordination can be strengthened.
example score
5/12
Reference Group Value (RGV)
Referentiality reflects how meaningful and personally valuable being part of the team is for its members.
Low
Moderate
High
14: Low | 57: Moderate | 812: High
A score of 5 indicates a moderate level of referentiality, meaning team membership is somewhat important but not a strong source of identification for everyone.
example score
6/12
Integrativity (I)
Integrativity measures how coherent and unified the team is in its internal processes and in working toward shared goals.
Low unity
Moderate unity
High unity
14: Low unity | 57: Moderate unity | 812: High unity
A score of 6 indicates moderate unity, suggesting the team has some shared alignment but may show inconsistencies in coordination when pursuing goals.
example score
10/12
Goal Orientation (GO)
Orientation reflects how clearly team members understand shared goals, interests, and norms and how well they coordinate actions toward common outcomes.
Low
Moderate
High
16: Low | 79: Moderate | 1012: High
A score of 10 indicates a high level of shared goal and norm awareness with strong coordination toward common results.
example score
10/12
Preparedness (P)
Preparedness measures how ready and organized the team is to take on assigned tasks and act effectively.
Low readiness
Developing readiness
High readiness
16: Low readiness | 79: Developing readiness | 1012: High readiness
A score of 10 indicates the team is well organized and ready to move into action with minimal additional preparation.
example score
8/12
Group Development Level (GDL)
This scale measures the team’s maturity, cohesion, and overall readiness to work effectively together toward goals.
Low
Moderate
High
16: Low | 79: Moderate | 1012: High
A score of 8 indicates a moderately developed team with sufficient cohesion and structure to accomplish tasks effectively, with some room for further strengthening.
example score
7/12
Activity (A)
Activity reflects how actively the team engages in socially significant actions and how fully members' potential is realized in joint work.
Low activity
Moderate activity
High activity
16: Low activity | 79: Moderate activity | 1012: High activity
A score of 7 indicates moderate activity, suggesting the team generally engages in meaningful action with some room to better mobilize members' potential.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Team leads and managers
41%OF USERS
They want a fast, structured snapshot of morale, cohesion, and readiness to deliver before setting goals or reorganizing work.
Project kickoff teams
34%OF USERS
They take it before a new initiative to spot collaboration risks early and align how the group will work together.
HR and people partners
25%OF USERS
They use it during change or growth to identify friction points and plan targeted team development support.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Organization (O)
Organization (O)
Average
7.8
Normal range
6.49.2
min.
1
max.
12
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Cohesion (C)
Cohesion (C)
Average
8.9
Normal range
7.310.6
min.
1
max.
12
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Referentiality (R)
Referentiality (R)
Average
4.6
Normal range
3.26.1
min.
1
max.
12
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Integrativity (I)
Integrativity (I)
Average
6.8
Normal range
5.28.4
min.
1
max.
12
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Orientation (O)
Orientation (O)
Average
4.4
Normal range
2.36.4
min.
1
max.
12
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Preparedness (P)
Preparedness (P)
Average
4.2
Normal range
2.46
min.
1
max.
12
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Group Development Level (GDL)
Group Development Level (GDL)
Average
4.8
Normal range
3.26.4
min.
1
max.
12
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Activity (A)
Activity (A)
Average
6.2
Normal range
4.87.7
min.
1
max.
12
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

    • 12: All team members have deep professional knowledge, can successfully apply it in practice, and are interested in improving their qualifications. Each team member has professional credibility. The team achieves high performance at work.
    • 11
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8: Most team members have good professional training, strive to improve their qualifications, and try to apply their knowledge in practice.
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5: In our team, there are also insufficiently qualified employees who, because of their self-importance, damage the team’s professional reputation.
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1: Team members have a low level of professional training. In most matters, they are amateurs who cannot competently solve work-related problems or perform their duties professionally. The team often fails to meet production targets.
    • 12: Our group has a shared, clear goal for everyone, which is recognized and understood by each person as their own. The group relies on long-standing traditions, developing mutually respectful standards of behavior and shared values. In our group, integrity, honesty, and selflessness are highly valued.
    • 11
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8: Our group has a shared task. Each member tries to meet their own interests while working toward the shared group task. In our group, mutually acceptable standards of behavior have been established.
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5: Each member of our group has individual goals and values that are completely independent of the group’s official goal. Each person follows their own norms and rules in their behavior, without trying to align them with other group members.
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1: Our group exists only as a formal organization; its goals are not accepted and often conflict with the goals of individual members. Each person builds their behavior around self-centered goals. Relationships are marked by conflict and aggressiveness.
    • 12: Our group is able to organize its work and leisure independently. Relationships are based on cooperation, mutual assistance, and goodwill. We always decide together, in a united way, how to organize our work most effectively. The group has respected specialists who can take on the functions of work organizers.
    • 11
    • 10
    • 9
    • 8: Our group often tries to organize its work independently, but this is not always effective. Our organizer (leader, foreman, supervisor) does not have a clear understanding of the work plan and each person’s capabilities.
    • 7
    • 6
    • 5: When the group tries to organize joint work, there are many disputes, fuss, and losses of valuable time. There is no one in the group who can take on the role of organizer. As a result, a higher-level manager has to intervene.
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1: Group members cannot agree on how to organize work together. They often interfere with each other or do unnecessary, duplicated work. Competition, aggression, and suppression of the individual predominate in the group. There is no one who is able to take on organizing functions. Even a higher-level manager is unable to manage the group.
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment
Pulsar Test

Pulsar Test - Symptoms and Signs

team climate
arrange

This measure is used to obtain a brief snapshot of group functioning and current socioemotional climate. The Pulsar Test is designed for administration to all members of a team to summarize perceptions of cohesion, coordination, and readiness to work effectively.

The instrument includes 7 items and typically takes about 2 minutes to complete. Item responses are aggregated to describe the group’s overall profile, which may help identify strengths and areas for improvement in collaboration and task-focused interaction.

The Pulsar Test is attributed to David M. Buss and is intended for use as a screening tool rather than a stand-alone diagnostic method; results should be interpreted in context with additional information about the team and setting.

Author: David M. Buss
Literature: Schein, E. H. Organizational culture and leadership. Jossey-Bass. 2004.; Cascio, W. F., & Aguinis, H. Applied psychology in human resource management. Pearson. 2005.
Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment