Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
existential psychology

Existential Motivations Test in the Multilevel Personality Questionnaire

Take the online Existential Motivations Test in the Multilevel Personality Questionnaire - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Existential Motivations Test in the Multilevel Personality Questionnairehere. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
Understand your sense of meaning and fulfillment, especially in close relationships, in about 7 minutes. Get clear insights into where you feel energized or blocked, supporting focused counseling and research.
Start Online Test
Questions: 367 minutes
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
October 2, 2025
Material has been published
23,345 views
2,419 completions
2,124 likes
Verified by Daniel Hall
Psychologist with 25 years of experience
Share
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score
11/18
Time (T)
Measures how much time you invest in close relationships and how meaningful and valuable that time feels to you.
Limited meaningful time
Moderate meaningful time
Strong meaningful time
06: Limited meaningful time | 712: Moderate meaningful time | 1318: Strong meaningful time
A score of 11 suggests you generally devote a moderate amount of time to relationships and often experience that time as meaningful, with some room to deepen its value or consistency.
example score
9/18
Relatedness (R)
Assesses how strongly a person feels connected to other people and personal values in a way that supports meaning and joy in life.
Low connectedness
Moderate connectedness
High connectedness
06: Low connectedness | 712: Moderate connectedness | 1318: High connectedness
A score of 9 indicates moderate connectedness, suggesting some meaningful engagement with others and values, with room to strengthen feelings of relational fulfillment.
example score
7/18
Shared Future (SF)
Assesses how strongly a person perceives a meaningful, valuable shared future and prospects for joint activities within the relationship.
Limited shared future
Developing shared future
Strong shared future
06: Limited shared future | 712: Developing shared future | 1318: Strong shared future
A score of 7 suggests a developing sense of shared future, with some perceived prospects for the relationship but room for greater clarity and value in long-term joint plans.
example score
10/18
Engagement in Relationships (EiR)
Measures how actively and meaningfully a person is involved in close relationships and other relational systems that provide life structure and meaning.
Low engagement
Moderate engagement
High engagement
06: Low engagement | 712: Moderate engagement | 1318: High engagement
A score of 10 indicates a moderate level of relational engagement, suggesting generally present and meaningful involvement with others alongside some areas where connection or investment may feel uneven.
example score
13/18
Opportunities for Action (OfA)
Assesses how much room and permission a person experiences for active participation and self-realization in life and close relationships.
Limited room for activity
Some room for activity
Wide room for activity
06: Limited room for activity | 712: Some room for activity | 1318: Wide room for activity
A score of 13 suggests a wide perceived space for taking initiative and being active in relationships and everyday life.
example score
13/54
Fundamental Motivation 4: Meaning in Relationships (FM4MiR)
Measures how strongly a person experiences meaning, engagement, and a shared future within close relationships.
Low meaning in relationships
Moderate meaning in relationships
High meaning in relationships
017: Low meaning in relationships | 1834: Moderate meaning in relationships | 3554: High meaning in relationships
A score of 13 suggests the person currently experiences limited sense of meaning, engagement, or shared future in their close relationships.
example score
3/18
Recognition of Value (RoV)
Measures how strongly a person recognizes their own uniqueness and value and acknowledges the worth of others within relationships.
Low recognition
Moderate recognition
High recognition
06: Low recognition | 712: Moderate recognition | 1318: High recognition
A score of 3 suggests a low level of acknowledging value, indicating the person may currently have difficulty consistently noticing their own worth and/or validating others’ value in close contact.
example score
4/18
Fair Treatment (FT)
Measures how fair and balanced a person perceives their close relationships to be, both in how others treat them and how they treat themselves.
Low fairness
Mixed fairness
High fairness
06: Low fairness | 712: Mixed fairness | 1318: High fairness
A score of 4 suggests a generally low sense of fairness in relationships, with experiences of imbalance or inequity being more prominent than a feeling of mutual respect.
example score
11/18
Engaged Attention (EA)
Measures how much a person shows attentive, caring interest toward their own individuality and the individuality of others in close relationships.
Low
Moderate
High
06: Low | 712: Moderate | 1318: High
A score of 11 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting a generally present but not consistently strong tendency to notice and value individuality in relationships.
example score
28/54
Fundamental Motivation 3: Authenticity in Relationships (FM3AiR)
Measures how able a person feels to be themselves in close relationships, make their own choices, and feel recognized and treated fairly.
Constrained authenticity
Mixed authenticity
Strong authenticity
027: Constrained authenticity | 2844: Mixed authenticity | 4554: Strong authenticity
A score of 28 suggests a mixed level of authenticity in relationships, with some experiences of being valued and self-directed alongside areas where recognition or openness may feel limited.
example score
7/18
Closeness (C)
Closeness measures the degree of emotional and psychological intimacy a person experiences in close relationships, supporting feelings of joy and satisfaction.
Low closeness
Moderate closeness
High closeness
06: Low closeness | 712: Moderate closeness | 1318: High closeness
A score of 7 indicates a moderate level of closeness, suggesting some felt intimacy in relationships alongside noticeable room to deepen emotional contact.
example score
40/54
Fundamental Motivation 2: Value of Life in Relationships (FM2VoLiR)
FM-2 measures how much joy, emotional richness, and satisfaction a person experiences in close relationships through alignment, timing, and closeness.
Low fulfillment
Moderate fulfillment
High fulfillment
024: Low fulfillment | 2539: Moderate fulfillment | 4054: High fulfillment
A score of 40 falls in the High fulfillment range, suggesting generally strong enjoyment and emotional richness in close relationships.
example score
8/18
Space (S)
Measures how much physical and psychological room a person experiences for self-realization and free choice within close relationships.
Limited space
Some space
Ample space
06: Limited space | 712: Some space | 1318: Ample space
A score of 8 indicates a moderate sense of space, suggesting some room for autonomy and self-expression in relationships alongside noticeable constraints.
example score
7/18
Security (S)
Measures the extent to which a person feels safe, accepted, and able to rely on support in close relationships.
Low security
Moderate security
High security
06: Low security | 712: Moderate security | 1318: High security
A score of 7 suggests a moderate sense of security, with some felt support in relationships alongside areas where safety or acceptance may feel less stable.
example score
12/18
Support (S)
Measures the degree to which a person experiences stable internal and external foundations they can rely on in life and close relationships.
Limited support
Moderate support
Strong support
06: Limited support | 712: Moderate support | 1318: Strong support
A score of 12 indicates moderate support, suggesting generally reliable foundations with some areas that may still feel less steady or dependable.
example score
40/54
Fundamental Motivation 1: Trust in Relationships (FM1TiR)
Measures how much trust, safety, and perceived freedom a person experiences in close relationships.
Low trust & safety
Moderate trust
High trust & security
021: Low trust & safety | 2238: Moderate trust | 3954: High trust & security
A score of 40 falls in the High trust & security range, suggesting a generally strong sense of safety, support, and openness to closeness in relationships.
example score
71/216
Existential Fulfillment in Relationships (EFiR)
Measures how fully a person experiences meaning, authenticity, freedom of choice, and valuing of life within close interpersonal relationships.
Low fulfillment
Moderate fulfillment
High fulfillment
097: Low fulfillment | 98157: Moderate fulfillment | 158216: High fulfillment
A score of 71 falls in the Low fulfillment range, suggesting the person currently experiences limited existential satisfaction and meaning in their close relationships.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Meaning-seeking adults
41%OF USERS
People who feel stuck, empty, or at a crossroads and want a clear picture of what gives their life meaning and where fulfillment is blocked.
Relationship reflection seekers
34%OF USERS
Those who sense recurring distance or dissatisfaction in close relationships and want to understand how their inner motives show up in contact with others.
Clients in counseling
25%OF USERS
Individuals already working with a psychologist who want a quick self-check to name core needs and set a focused direction for therapy.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Time (T)
Time (T)
Average
12.3
Normal range
9.215.4
min.
0
max.
18
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Correlation (C)
Correlation (C)
Average
12.5
Normal range
10.114.8
min.
0
max.
18
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Shared Future (SF)
Shared Future (SF)
Average
7
Normal range
4.39.7
min.
0
max.
18
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Engagement in Relationships (EiR)
Engagement in Relationships (EiR)
Average
8.7
Normal range
5.511.9
min.
0
max.
18
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Opportunities for Activities (OfA)
Opportunities for Activities (OfA)
Average
9.3
Normal range
6.212.4
min.
0
max.
18
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
FM-4: The Meaning of Relationships (FTMoR)
FM-4: The Meaning of Relationships (FTMoR)
Average
34.7
Normal range
2742.3
min.
0
max.
54
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Acknowledging Value (AV)
Acknowledging Value (AV)
Average
11
Normal range
8.513.6
min.
0
max.
18
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Fair Treatment (FT)
Fair Treatment (FT)
Average
8.9
Normal range
6.111.8
min.
0
max.
18
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Interested attention (Ia)
Interested attention (Ia)
Average
6.2
Normal range
39.4
min.
0
max.
18
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
FM-3: Authenticity in Relationships (FAiR)
FM-3: Authenticity in Relationships (FAiR)
Average
14.4
Normal range
7.820.9
min.
0
max.
54
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Closeness (C)
Closeness (C)
Average
9.8
Normal range
6.712.9
min.
0
max.
18
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
FM-2: The Value of Life in Relationships (FTVoLiR)
FM-2: The Value of Life in Relationships (FTVoLiR)
Average
37.9
Normal range
27.948
min.
0
max.
54
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Space (S)
Space (S)
Average
11.8
Normal range
8.614.9
min.
0
max.
18
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Security (S)
Security (S)
Average
13.2
Normal range
10.815.6
min.
0
max.
18
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Support (S)
Support (S)
Average
11.5
Normal range
8.814.2
min.
0
max.
18
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
FM-1: Trust in Relationships (FTiR)
FM-1: Trust in Relationships (FTiR)
Average
27
Normal range
19.234.9
min.
0
max.
54
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Existential Fulfillment in Relationships (EFiR)
Existential Fulfillment in Relationships (EFiR)
Average
101.4
Normal range
69.3133.5
min.
0
max.
216
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

    • Completely untrue
    • Mostly untrue
    • Rather untrue
    • Rather true
    • Mostly true
    • Completely true
    • Completely untrue
    • Mostly untrue
    • Generally untrue
    • Mostly true
    • Generally true
    • Completely true
    • Does not describe me at all
    • Mostly does not describe me
    • Somewhat does not describe me
    • Somewhat describes me
    • Mostly describes me
    • Describes me completely
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment
Existential Motivations Test in the MLO, TEMMO

Existential Motivations Test in the Multilevel Personality Questionnaire - Symptoms and Signs

existential psychology
fulfillment
meaningfulness

This measure is designed to assess self-reported existential motivation and perceived life meaningfulness within a multilevel personality framework. The Existential Motivations Test in the Multilevel Personality Questionnaire is completed as a brief questionnaire and is intended to support clinical formulation by clarifying how individuals appraise fulfillment, purpose, and engagement in key life domains. It includes 36 items and typically takes about 7 minutes to complete. Authors are cited as Viktor E. Frankl, Rollo May, and James C. Crumbaugh.

Content coverage generally centers on subjective experience of meaning, inner consent, and perceived realization of core life motives, with particular attention to how these themes may be reflected in interpersonal contexts. Results from the Existential Motivations Test in the Multilevel Personality Questionnaire should be interpreted in conjunction with clinical interview data and other assessment findings, as they reflect self-report and may be influenced by current mood, insight, and response style.

Author: James C. Crumbaugh, Rollo May, Viktor E. Frankl
Literature: Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist. 2000.; Steger, M. F., Frazier, P., Oishi, S., & Kaler, M. The meaning in life questionnaire: Assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 2006.
Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment