Napoleon Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Definitely yes; I completely agree
- Yes; I agree
- Possibly yes; I partly agree
- Neither agree nor disagree
- Possibly no; I partly disagree
- No; I do not agree
- Definitely no; I completely disagree
- Definitely yes, completely agree
- Yes, agree
- Possibly yes, partly agree
- Neutral / neither agree nor disagree
- Possibly no, partly disagree
- No, disagree
- Definitely no, completely disagree
- Definitely yes, I completely agree
- Yes, I agree
- Possibly yes, I partly agree
- Neither agree nor disagree
- Possibly no, I partly disagree
- No, I disagree
- Definitely no, I completely disagree
Napoleon Test - Description and methodology of the test
People who want to examine how they relate to independence, personal importance, and authority may find the Napoleon Test useful for structured self-reflection. This personality assessment focuses on recurring attitudes in work, social, and decision-making situations. The result describes three related tendencies rather than offering a single label, helping you consider how confidence, self-interest, and control may shape your interactions.
What This Assessment Explores
This assessment examines attitudes affecting independence, self-interest, disagreement, responsibility, and influence. Its statements address convictions, strength, money, hierarchy, freedom, and directing others. Read as a personality questionnaire, the exercise is most useful when compared with recurring behavior rather than treated as a fixed trait.
The three displayed dimensions describe different parts of the resulting profile:
- Self-Sufficiency (18-126) reflects belief in personal infallibility and independence from others' evaluations; Lower self-sufficiency (18-54), Moderate self-sufficiency (55-90), and High self-sufficiency (91-126).
- Egocentrism (18-126) reflects self-centeredness and prioritises personal interests, even when this can disadvantage others; Low (18-54), Moderate (55-90), and High (91-126).
- Authoritarianism (18-126) shows the pull toward directing or subordinating others and resisting control: Low (18-54), Moderate (55-90), and High (91-126).
Together, the profile shows which tendencies are more pronounced; one elevated scale does not define every relationship or decision.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Seven-point responses run from definite agreement to definite disagreement, with a neutral midpoint. Statements and proverbs address leadership, toughness, self-reliance, criticism, control, and personal advantage. Answers produce three dimensions rather than one total score.
Each dimension has lower, moderate, and high interpretation bands; the display does not show each answer's contribution, so item weights should not be inferred. Because this is an online psychological test, comparisons are easy to review, and the listed bands are this questionnaire's displayed bands. Self-reported answers can shift with current circumstances, self-presentation, and self-awareness.
Valery Pryadein's 2013 Authoritarianism, Egocentrism, Self-Sufficiency (Napoleon) is the named published instrument. This online questionnaire is separate from it and conceptually consistent with it, rather than an online version or adaptation. Its authority and dominance themes are also conceptually consistent with Adorno and colleagues' 1950 work and Duckitt's 1983 reappraisal of directiveness and authoritarianism, without reproducing their samples, norms, or validation.
Use the profile as a structured perspective on tendencies, alongside the context in which the answers were given.
- Pryadein, Valery Pavlovich. (2013). "Authoritarianism, Egocentrism, and Self-Sufficiency (Napoleon): Questionnaire." In Psychodiagnostics of Personality: Selected Psychological Methods and Tests, pp. 131-133. Surgut: Editorial and Publishing Department of Surgut State Pedagogical University.
- Adorno, Theodor W., Else Frenkel-Brunswik, Daniel J. Levinson, and Nevitt Sanford. (1950). The Authoritarian Personality. New York: Harper & Brothers.
- Duckitt, J. H. (1983). "Directiveness and Authoritarianism: Some Research Findings and a Critical Reappraisal." South African Journal of Psychology, 13(1), 10-12. 10.1177/008124638301300103
Updated: