Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
moral

Am i evil quiz

Am i evil quiz - Free Online Quiz - FreudlyYou can take Good and Evil Testhere. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
This 44-item questionnaire measures the balance between virtuous and malevolent personality traits — scoring both your "Good" and "Evil" dimensions independently — and takes about 9 minutes. Take this am i evil quiz to get a research-based profile of how strongly cynicism, self-centeredness, and moral disengagement appear in your personality alongside empathy, benevolence, and responsibility.
Start Online Test
Questions: 449 minutes
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
October 2, 2025
Material has been published
33,255 views
4,713 completions
2,936 likes
Verified by Daniel Hall
Psychologist with 25 years of experience
Share
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score
77/90
Good–Evil Index (GE) (GEI)
The Good − Evil (GE) Index measures the balance between virtuous and malevolent personality traits, with higher scores indicating more virtuous predominance.
Malevolent traits prevail
Virtuous traits prevail
Strong virtuous predominance
-820: Malevolent traits prevail | 160: Virtuous traits prevail | 6190: Strong virtuous predominance
A score of 77 falls in the “Strong virtuous predominance” range, indicating a pronounced tilt toward virtuous qualities over malevolent traits on this index.
example score
89/126
Evil (E)
Measures the intensity of malevolent traits such as vanity, cynicism, envy, and a tendency to disregard others' interests.
Low
Moderate
High
4269: Low | 7087: Moderate | 88126: High
A score of 89 falls in the High range, suggesting a stronger-than-average expression of cynical, self-centered, and potentially aggressive interpersonal attitudes.
example score
100/132
Good (G)
Measures the strength of virtuous traits such as humility, responsibility, benevolence, and selfless concern for others.
Lower goodness
Moderate goodness
Higher goodness
4490: Lower goodness | 91104: Moderate goodness | 105132: Higher goodness
A score of 100 falls in the Moderate goodness range, suggesting a generally prosocial and responsible orientation that is present but not consistently dominant across situations.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Students exploring values
41%OF USERS
Teens and young adults take it to understand their moral beliefs, reactions to ethical dilemmas, and personal value priorities.
Counseling and coaching clients
34%OF USERS
People in therapy or counseling use it to spot where guilt, aggression, empathy, or fairness issues may be affecting decisions and relationships.
Educators and group leaders
25%OF USERS
Teachers, youth leaders, and trainers use it to quickly map group value dynamics and discuss moral development in a structured way.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Good − Evil (GE) (G−E()
Good − Evil (GE) (G−E()
Average
-35.4
Normal range
-67.2-3.6
min.
-82
max.
90
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Evil (E)
Evil (E)
Average
78.2
Normal range
63.193.4
min.
42
max.
126
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Hello (H)
Hello (H)
Average
85.9
Normal range
71100.8
min.
44
max.
132
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

    • Completely agree
    • Partly agree
    • Completely disagree
    • Completely agree
    • Partly agree
    • Completely disagree
    • Completely agree
    • Partly agree
    • Completely disagree
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment
Test Good and Evil, GE
moral
morality

The am i evil quiz is a 44-item self-report instrument grounded in the moral psychology frameworks of Kohlberg and Haidt that measures the balance between virtuous and malevolent personality traits. It produces three independent scores — a Good score reflecting empathy, benevolence, humility, and responsibility; an Evil score reflecting cynicism, vanity, envy, and disregard for others; and a Good–Evil Index that summarizes which orientation predominates — giving a nuanced moral self-concept profile rather than a simple good-or-evil verdict.

Why Take an Am I Evil Quiz

Most people carry a mix of prosocial and antisocial tendencies that they rarely examine consciously. Understanding where cynicism, self-centeredness, or moral disengagement genuinely appear in your personality — and where virtuous traits like empathy and fairness are strongest — provides a concrete basis for self-reflection and targeted personal development. It also helps distinguish between genuinely concerning dark personality traits and normal human moral ambivalence.

An evil quiz grounded in moral psychology is also used by counselors and educators to open structured conversations about ethical values, moral development, and value-based decision-making. Results provide a shared vocabulary for discussing where ethical tension or inconsistency may be affecting relationships and choices.

What the Assessment Measures

  • Evil (E) score — the intensity of malevolent traits including vanity, cynicism, envy, schadenfreude, and a tendency to disregard others' interests and well-being; scored 42–126.
  • Good (G) score — the strength of virtuous traits including humility, responsibility, benevolence, empathy, and selfless concern for others; scored 44–132.
  • Good–Evil Index (GE) — a composite score balancing virtuous against malevolent traits, ranging from −82 (malevolent predominance) to +90 (strong virtuous predominance), giving an overall moral self-concept orientation.

Who This Assessment Is For

The am i evil quiz is appropriate for teenagers and adults who are curious about the balance of prosocial and antisocial tendencies in their personality and want a research-based answer rather than a pop-quiz guess. It is widely used by students exploring their ethical values, people in therapy or counseling examining where cynicism or moral disengagement may be affecting their relationships, and educators and group leaders who want to map moral trait dynamics within a class or group. The am i evil assessment is also suitable for anyone who has wondered whether dark personality tendencies like cynicism, envy, or disregard for fairness are genuinely prominent in their character — or whether they are simply experiencing normal human moral complexity. No clinical background is needed — items describe specific attitudes and reactions, and respondents simply choose the first answer that feels accurate.

Clinical Validity and Use in Practice

The Good and Evil Test is grounded in the moral development frameworks of Kohlberg and the moral foundations theory of Haidt, and draws on Bandura's research on moral disengagement. The three-score structure allows the instrument to capture that good and evil are not simply opposite ends of one dimension — a person can score moderately high on both, reflecting genuine moral ambivalence, or high on one and low on the other. In clinical and educational practice, results are most useful as a conversation-opener about ethical values and moral self-concept rather than as a definitive character verdict. Scores should be interpreted in the context of cultural norms, developmental level, and the specific version of the instrument administered, as norms differ across versions.

Author: Jonathan Haidt, Lawrence Kohlberg
Literature: Haidt, J. The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. Pantheon Books. 2012.; Bandura, A. Moral disengagement: How people do harm and live with themselves. Worth Publishers. 2016.; Narvaez, D., & Lapsley, D. K. (Eds.). Personality, identity, and character: Explorations in moral psychology. Cambridge University Press. 2009.
Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment