Teacher Professional Activity Questionnaire Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- No
- Rather no
- Not sure
- Rather yes
- Yes
- No
- Probably no
- Not sure
- Probably yes
- Yes
- No
- Somewhat disagree
- Not sure
- Somewhat agree
- Yes
Teacher Professional Activity Questionnaire Test - Description and methodology of the test
For teachers reflecting on how they work, adapt, and sustain purposeful engagement, the Teacher Professional Activity Questionnaire Test provides a structured way to examine professional functioning. As a teacher activity assessment, it can help identify aspects of classroom practice, motivation, self-regulation, and interaction with students that merit closer attention. The result can support discussion of priorities and concrete goals for professional practice.
What This Assessment Explores
The professional activity test for teachers shows seven scales:
- Teacher Professional Activity Potential (9-45) measures development capacity: Lower potential 9-21; Moderate potential 22-33; Higher potential 34-45.
- Professional Activity Outcome Component (9-45) measures goal attainment: Needs strengthening 9-21; Moderate effectiveness 22-33; High effectiveness 34-45.
- TPAQ Dynamic Component (9-45) measures flexibility: Low 9-20; Moderate 21-33; High 34-45.
- Regulatory Component (9-45) measures regulation: Low regulation 9-21; Moderate regulation 22-33; High regulation 34-45.
- Self-Rated Pedagogical Interaction Competence (9-45) measures interaction: Low confidence 9-20; Moderate confidence 21-33; High confidence 34-45.
- Professional Motivation (9-45) measures motivation: Low 9-21; Moderate 22-33; High 34-45.
- Teacher Professional Activity (9-45) measures engagement: Low activity 9-21; Moderate activity 22-33; High activity 34-45.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Questions are first-person statements about motivation, emotional recovery, innovation, lesson results, self-regulation, and student relationships. Five ordered responses generally run from No to Yes, with intermediate choices such as Not sure or Difficult to answer. Respondents rate how each statement fits their work; item-level scoring direction is unspecified.
The questionnaire displays seven scores, each with a 9-45 range. The display includes component scores and an overall activity score; the item-to-scale aggregation rule and any weighting system are unspecified.
Volochkov's work on teacher activeness and related work by Volochkov and Popov on coping in teacher-student interactions provide conceptual references for purposeful engagement, regulation, change, and achievement. The online questionnaire is conceptually consistent with these works, not presented as a direct adaptation.
The online questionnaire has no stated norms or standardization data. Because this professional activity questionnaire for teachers uses self-report, current workload, school climate, recent setbacks, and self-perception can influence scores. Results are best used to identify priorities and compare them with concrete work goals; they support self-understanding, not a diagnosis.
- Volochkov, Andrey. “Teacher Professional Activeness as a Resource for Coping with Stress.” In Resources and Anti-Resources of Personality in Contemporary Coping Research: Proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific-Practical Conference with International Participation, Omsk State University Press, 2012, pp. 17-22. ISBN 978-5-7779-1525-2.
- Volochkov, Andrey, and Alexey Popov. “Stress in Teacher-Student Interactions and Teacher Activeness as a Positive Coping Resource.” In International Perspectives on Teacher Stress, Emerald Publishing, 2012. 10.1108/978-1-61735-917-020251018
- Volochkov, Andrei. “Activity of Subject of Life Sphere: Theoretical Model and Empirical Data.” The Psychology. Journal of Higher School of Economics, vol. 7, no. 1, 2010, pp. 19-54.
Updated: