Authentic Leadership Questionnaire (ALQ) Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Neither agree nor disagree
- Agree
- Strongly agree
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Neutral
- Agree
- Strongly agree
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Neutral
- Agree
- Strongly agree
Authentic Leadership Questionnaire (ALQ) Test - Description and methodology of the test
For managers, team leads, and people examining their own influence, the Authentic Leadership Questionnaire (ALQ) Test offers a focused way to review everyday leadership habits and consider how they appear in practice. An authentic leadership assessment can help a reader use the result to choose behaviors to observe, discuss, and develop in real team situations.
What This Assessment Explores
Authentic leadership describes a style grounded in self-awareness, transparent relationships, careful consideration of differing views, and internal moral standards. The questionnaire suits readers who want to examine how they present themselves, respond to disagreement, make choices under pressure, and acknowledge strengths, limitations, feelings, or mistakes.
Results use one scale, Authentic Leadership (0-100), with bands labelled Developing (0-39), Established (40-69), and Highly authentic (70-100). Here, these bands describe the apparent development of the measured authentic leadership style, not a permanent identity or complete judgment of leadership ability.
These are the four dimensions reflected in the result:
- Self-awareness shows how clearly you recognize strengths, weaknesses, feelings, and mistakes.
- Relational transparency reflects openness in how you communicate with others.
- Balanced processing indicates willingness to consider disagreement before deciding.
- Internalized moral standards show whether choices follow personal values rather than outside pressure.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each statement uses one of five agreement choices, from Strongly disagree to Strongly agree, with a neutral middle option. Items address self-knowledge, openness, moral consistency, independent judgment, and receptiveness to other views; some describe desired qualities while others describe tendencies to resist.
The displayed score summarizes the response pattern on a 0-100 scale. Item weights, any reverse-scoring instructions, and the conversion formula are not stated, so no points should be inferred for an individual answer. The result is a profile of currently reported authentic leadership traits.
Conceptually, the questionnaire is consistent with Authentic Leadership Questionnaire (ALQ) (Walumbwa et al., 2008), the ALQ manual, and Avolio and Gardner’s leadership-development framework. This is an online self-reflection version of the ALQ concepts, not a standardized reproduction of the published measure. The model connects authentic leadership with self-awareness, relational transparency, balanced processing, and an internalized moral perspective.
Self-report results can vary with current role demands, recent experiences, self-awareness, and the wish to appear favorable. Use the score with observed behavior and concrete feedback; its bands are descriptive categories for this questionnaire, not universal norms.
- Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Wernsing, T. S., & Peterson, S. J. (2008). Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of Management, 34(1), 89-126. 10.1177/0149206307308913
- Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., & Walumbwa, F. O. (2007). Authentic Leadership Questionnaire (ALQ). Menlo Park, CA: Mind Garden.
- Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 315-338. 10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.001
Updated: