Bullying Structure Identification Questionnaire Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Yes, I am friends with everyone.
- I have a couple of friends.
- No, I am not friends with anyone.
- I would like to be friends with everyone.
- A) Yes, one or two.
- B) No, I like everyone.
- V) I dislike everyone.
- G) Yes, but they are disliked by everyone in the class.
- A) Yes, in everything.
- B) Sometimes.
- C) No, everyone looks up to me.
- D) No, I do not feel worse than others.
Bullying Structure Identification Questionnaire Test - Description and methodology of the test
For a person reflecting on a school peer environment, this peer aggression questionnaire offers a structured way to examine involvement in peer aggression and exclusion. The Bullying Structure Identification Questionnaire Test connects everyday reactions-remaining silent, helping, joining in, or being targeted-with a broader profile of classroom participation. It helps organize observations about classroom relationships and clarify how personal reactions fit within the surrounding peer context.
What This Assessment Explores
Items address status, aggression, exclusion, empathy, and intervention; classroom bullying roles form patterns, not isolated acts.
Five scales are:
- Bystander (0-22) measures non-active witnessing: Low observer role (0-7), Moderate observer role (8-14), High observer role (15-22).
- Victim (0-22) measures victimization through psychological aggression, isolation, anxiety, and depression: Low (0-7), Moderate (8-14), High (15-22).
- Defender (0-22) measures defending victims: Low defender role (0-7), Moderate defender role (8-14), High defender role (15-22).
- Assistant (0-22) measures support or imitation of the aggressor and direct bullying: Low involvement (0-7), Moderate involvement (8-14), High involvement (15-22).
- Initiator (0-22) measures the aggressive perpetrator role, possible aggression toward peers, teachers, or family, and bullying leadership: Low initiator role (0-7), Moderate initiator role (8-14), High initiator role (15-22).
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each item presents a brief classroom situation or self-description with several response choices. Options distinguish discomfort, social distance, aggression, indifference, support, and intervention; the respondent selects the statement closest to their experience. This self-report format organizes how reactions map onto roles.
The questionnaire is conceptually consistent with Norkina’s 2016 role-based methodology, but it is not that published method or a direct adaptation. The 2023 study by Sinogina and Lomovskaya and Glazman’s 2009 work offer contextual research on bullying roles, aggression, empathy, status, and peer responses; they do not validate this online questionnaire.
The resulting bullying role profile presents a separate result for each role, with displayed ranges and bands organizing the overall pattern. The respondent-facing format does not specify how many points each answer contributes, so point values should not be inferred from a scale's maximum or band boundaries.
The displayed bands are descriptive: they provide no normative comparison or clinical threshold. Self-report scores can shift with current classroom context, memory, social desirability, and willingness to disclose, so interpret the pattern alongside surrounding relationships and behavior.
- Norkina, E. G. Methodology for Identifying the Bullying Structure. Tavricheskiy nauchnyy obozrevatel'. 2016;3(8):170-174.
- Sinogina, E. S., & Lomovskaya, S. A. A study of adolescents' bullying structure and the relationship of cyberbullying to spirituality and empathy indicators. Pedagogical Review. 2023;5(51):121-129. 10.23951/2307-6127-2023-5-121-129
- Glazman, O. L. Psychological Characteristics of Bullying Participants. Izvestiya Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta imeni A. I. Gertsena. 2009;(105):159-165.
Updated: