Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
arrange

My Attitude Toward Work Questionnaire Test

Take the online My Attitude Toward Work Questionnaire Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take My Attitude Toward Work Questionnaire Test here. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
Completed in about 11 minutes, this 60-question My Attitude Toward Work Questionnaire Test explores how you experience values, fairness, teamwork, rewards, control, and workload. Your result highlights areas of alignment and strain, helping you reflect on workplace satisfaction, relationships, autonomy, and possible priorities for personal development.
Questions: 6011 minutes
My Attitude Toward Work: situation and reply bubbles
October 2, 2025October 2, 2025Material has been updatedOctober 2, 2025Material has been published
38,015 views
3,393 completions
2,819 likes
Daniel HallPsychologist · Test reviewer
2,819 likes
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

ValuesV
Measures how well your personal values align with the values and expectations emphasized in your workplace.
example score10/20
10/20Moderate alignmentexample score
0 – 7Low alignment
8 – 13Moderate alignment
14 – 20High alignment
A score of 10 suggests a moderate fit between your values and your workplace’s priorities, with some areas of alignment and some potential mismatches.
FairnessF
Measures how fair a person perceives workplace distribution of responsibilities, rewards, and decision-making to be.
example score7/20
7/20Low fairnessexample score
0 – 8Low fairness
9 – 14Moderate fairness
15 – 20High fairness
A score of 7 suggests a low perception of fairness, indicating concerns about how responsibilities, rewards, or decisions are handled at work.
Work TeamWT
Measures the perceived support, cohesion, and overall atmosphere in your work team.
example score14/20
14/20Mixed/variableexample score
0 – 7Strained/isolated
8 – 14Mixed/variable
15 – 20Supportive/cohesive
A score of 14 suggests a generally workable team climate with some inconsistencies in support or connection that may affect day-to-day mood and energy.
RewardsR
Measures satisfaction with how work is rewarded and recognized, including both material and non-material compensation.
example score14/20
14/20High rewardexample score
0 – 6Low reward
7 – 13Moderate reward
14 – 20High reward
A score of 14 indicates a high level of perceived reward and recognition for your work, suggesting you generally feel adequately compensated and appreciated.
ControlC
Measures how much autonomy and influence a person feels they have over tasks, decisions, and work conditions.
example score8/20
8/20Low controlexample score
0 – 9Low control
10 – 14Moderate control
15 – 20High control
A score of 8 suggests low perceived control, indicating limited autonomy and fewer opportunities to influence how work is organized.
WorkloadW
This scale measures how heavy and demanding the workload feels in day-to-day work.
example score16/20
16/20High workloadexample score
0 – 6Low workload
7 – 13Moderate workload
14 – 20High workload
A score of 16 falls in the high workload range, suggesting your current demands may be stretching your resources and reducing energy over time.
Overall Attitude Toward WorkOATW
This scale measures your overall attitude toward work by integrating perceptions of workload, control, support, team dynamics, fairness, rewards, and alignment with values.
example score4/10
4/10Strained fitexample score
1 – 4Strained fit
5 – 7Mixed fit
8 – 10Healthy fit
A score of 4 suggests a strained overall fit with current work conditions, indicating several areas may be undermining energy and satisfaction.
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Tired and overworked staff
41%OF USERS
People feeling drained, irritable, or close to burnout take it to pinpoint what in their workload, control, or support is undermining energy.
Team leads and HR
34%OF USERS
Managers and HR specialists use it to spot team-wide friction in values, fairness, feedback, and resources and plan targeted improvements.
Career changers and newcomers
25%OF USERS
Employees starting a new role or considering a change take it to check whether the job fits their values, growth needs, and sense of belonging.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Shaded area — where most people score
Dot — the average
You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test
ValuesV
You?
Average12.6
Typical rangeTypical9.7 – 15.4
Possible0 – 20
JusticeJ
You?
Average11.6
Typical rangeTypical9.1 – 14.1
Possible0 – 20
Work TeamWT
You?
Average7
Typical rangeTypical4.5 – 9.4
Possible0 – 20
RewardR
You?
Average8.1
Typical rangeTypical5.3 – 10.8
Possible0 – 20
ControlC
You?
Average9.1
Typical rangeTypical5.4 – 12.8
Possible0 – 20
WorkloadW
You?
Average11
Typical rangeTypical7.4 – 14.7
Possible0 – 20
My attitude toward workMatw
You?
Average4.6
Typical rangeTypical3.4 – 5.9
Possible1 – 10
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

Below are six areas of work. For each area, rate the extent to which your current job matches your preferences, typical work behavior patterns, and goals. How satisfied are you with it?
    • Completely satisfied
    • More dissatisfied than satisfied
    • Completely dissatisfied
    • Completely satisfied
    • More dissatisfied than satisfied
    • Completely dissatisfied
    • Completely satisfied
    • More dissatisfied than satisfied
    • Completely dissatisfied
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

My Attitude Toward Work Questionnaire Test - Description and methodology of the test

arrange
job satisfaction
burnout

People considering a role, coping with workplace strain, or reviewing their professional direction can use the My Attitude Toward Work Questionnaire Test to examine how organizational conditions shape their experience. It is intended for employees who want structured reflection on satisfaction, relationships, influence, recognition, and pressure. As a work attitude test, it produces a profile that can clarify strengths and areas needing attention.

What This Assessment Explores

Work attitudes are treated as fit with job conditions. This workplace satisfaction questionnaire identifies alignment, fairness, support, rewards, autonomy, and difficulty. The scales and bands are:

  • Values (0-20) measures alignment: Low alignment 0-7; Moderate alignment 8-13; High alignment 14-20.
  • Fairness (0-20) measures trust: Low fairness 0-8; Moderate fairness 9-14; High fairness 15-20.
  • Work Team measures cohesion: Strained/isolated 0-7; Mixed/variable 8-14; Supportive/cohesive 15-20.
  • Rewards (0-20) measures recognition: Low reward 0-6; Moderate reward 7-13; High reward 14-20.
  • Control (0-20) measures autonomy: Low control 0-9; Moderate control 10-14; High control 15-20.
  • Workload (0-20) measures pressure and challenge: Low workload 0-6; Moderate workload 7-13; High workload 14-20.
  • Overall Attitude Toward Work (1-10) integrates the profile: Strained fit 1-4; Mixed fit 5-7; Healthy fit 8-10.

Methodology and Scientific Basis

Each item rates a concrete workplace condition, including demands, breaks, communication, authority, pay, promotion, respect, and organizational mission. Three ordered responses move from completely satisfied to more dissatisfied than satisfied and completely dissatisfied.

The display organizes responses into six 0-20 dimensions and a 1-10 overall result. It supplies bands for interpretation, but does not state how answers become points; no extra formula should be inferred.

Conceptually, the questionnaire is consistent with the Areas of Worklife Scale (AWS), which links workload, control, reward, community, fairness, and values with burnout-related conditions. Leiter and Maslach’s six-area model is the closest comparison, while Maslach and Leiter’s 2008 study examines early predictors of burnout and engagement. With seven outputs, this version is not the AWS itself or an adaptation of it. A workplace attitude questionnaire organizes reflection without claiming the published scale’s evidence.

Current circumstances, expectations, self-awareness, and response style can shape answers; the cited studies do not establish identical reliability, validity, or standardized norms for this version, and its bands describe workplace patterns rather than clinical categories.

Author: G. R. Oldham, J. R. Hackman
Literature:
  • Leiter, M. P., & Maslach, C. (2004). Areas of Worklife: A Structured Approach to Organizational Predictors of Job Burnout. In P. L. Perrewé & D. C. Ganster (Eds.), Research in Occupational Stress and Well-Being: Vol. 3. Emotional and Physiological Processes and Positive Intervention Strategies (pp. 91-134). JAI Press/Elsevier. 10.1016/S1479-3555(03)03003-8
  • Leiter, M. P., & Maslach, C. (1999). Six Areas of Worklife: A Model of the Organizational Context of Burnout. Journal of Health and Human Services Administration, 21(4), 472-489. PMID 10621016
  • Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (2008). Early Predictors of Job Burnout and Engagement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(3), 498-512. 10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.498

Updated:

Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment