New Monetary Behavior Scale Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Somewhat disagree
- Neither agree nor disagree
- Somewhat agree
- Agree
- Strongly agree
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Somewhat disagree
- Neither agree nor disagree
- Somewhat agree
- Agree
- Strongly agree
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Somewhat disagree
- Not sure / neither agree nor disagree
- Somewhat agree
- Agree
- Strongly agree
New Monetary Behavior Scale Test - Description and methodology of the test
People who want to understand how money-related worry, status, influence, or monitoring may shape everyday choices can use the New Monetary Behavior Scale Test to examine those questions in a structured way. This money behavior test can show how responses fall across anxiety, social meaning, influence, and persistent monitoring. It helps readers consider which money-related situations deserve closer attention in their choices and relationships.
What This Assessment Explores
This assessment examines money as a source of security, status, influence, and concern. Items address worry, hesitation, deal-seeking, investment checking, social approval, and using money to gain cooperation. Rather than measuring financial skill, this financial behavior questionnaire describes everyday tendencies.
The result profile covers four dimensions:
- Financial Anxiety (1-7) measures worry about money and reluctance to decide; Low anxiety 1-3.4, Moderate anxiety 3.5-5.6, High anxiety 5.7-7.
- Money as a Tool of Influence (1-7) measures using money to influence others; Low influence use 1-1.5, Situational influence 1.6-4.1, High influence use 4.2-7.
- Importance for Social Respect (1-7) measures seeing money as a sign of success supporting respect or acceptance; Low 1-2.9, Moderate 3-5.3, High 5.4-7.
- Financial Obsession (1-7) measures persistent financial or market monitoring and deal-seeking; Low 1-2.8, Moderate 2.9-5, High 5.1-7.
Methodology and Evidence Base
Each statement uses a seven-point agreement response, from strong disagreement to strong agreement, with neutrality or uncertainty at the midpoint. Items connect concrete situations-worry, financial decisions, social approval, persuasion, purchases, deals, and investment monitoring-with broader money attitudes.
The questionnaire is conceptually consistent with the New Money Behavior Quiz (Furnham & Grover, 2020), but it is not an adaptation of that published instrument. Furnham’s 1984 work and Tang’s 1992 account of money’s meaning provide related context: money can function as a practical resource, social signal, and emotionally charged subject. It functions as a money attitudes assessment that organizes these themes into a profile.
The result screen reports each dimension on the displayed 1-7 scale, but the questionnaire does not state how individual answers contribute to those scores. The separate results let readers consider whether their money-related reactions differ across private decisions, market monitoring, and social situations.
Current financial pressure, self-awareness, and impression management can influence self-report answers. The result is therefore a structured snapshot, not a stand-alone clinical judgment.
- Furnham, A., & Grover, S. (2020). A New Money Behavior Quiz. Journal of Individual Differences, 41(1), 17-29. 10.1027/1614-0001/a000299
- Furnham, A. (1984). Many sides of the coin: The psychology of money usage. Personality and Individual Differences, 5(5), 501-509. 10.1016/0191-8869(84)90025-4
- Tang, T. L.-P. (1992). The meaning of money revisited. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2), 197-202. 10.1002/job.4030130209
Updated: