Social Media Use Social Motivation Assessment Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Somewhat disagree
- Neither agree nor disagree
- Somewhat agree
- Agree
- Strongly agree
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Somewhat disagree
- Neither agree nor disagree
- Somewhat agree
- Agree
- Strongly agree
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Somewhat disagree
- Neither agree nor disagree
- Somewhat agree
- Agree
- Strongly agree
Social Media Use Social Motivation Assessment Test - Description and methodology of the test
People who want to understand what draws them to online communities can use the Social Media Use Social Motivation Assessment Test as a focused self-report exercise. This social media motivation test is suitable for anyone reflecting on digital habits, especially the social purposes behind posting, joining groups, and keeping contact. The result describes a personal pattern rather than judging whether social media use is good or bad.
What This Assessment Explores
The questionnaire examines social reasons for using platforms rather than frequency, screen time, or satisfaction. It suits readers who want to understand whether online activity is driven mainly by belonging, image management, or relationship maintenance. For someone considering a social media use assessment, the profile gives familiar habits clearer psychological labels.
The result separates three motives:
- Group Belonging (3-21) shows the need to join communities, find like-minded people, and gain acceptance; Low 3-8, Moderate 9-15, High 16-21.
- Self-Presentation (3-21) shows the wish to shape others’ impressions by sharing selected thoughts, feelings, interests, and strengths; Low 3-8, Moderate 9-15, High 16-21.
- Maintaining and Developing Relationships (3-21) shows the motive to preserve and strengthen contact and develop social resources through online interaction; Low 3-9, Moderate 10-15, High 16-21.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each statement uses a seven-point agreement scale from Strongly disagree to Strongly agree. The items cover maintaining contact, meeting people, joining groups, identifying with peers, and shaping how others see the respondent. Responses are read as separate motives rather than as one overall measure of social-media involvement.
The result is reported separately for each motive, with each motive-specific result placed within its displayed band. As an online social motivation assessment, it describes the relative emphasis of belonging, self-presentation, and relationship maintenance, not personality rank or time spent online.
The closest named evidence base is the social-network motivation measure reported by Priporova and Agadullina in 2019. This questionnaire is conceptually consistent with that work; its items address belonging, self-presentation, and relationship maintenance through social-media use. Nadkarni and Hofmann’s 2012 Facebook research supports the relevance of belonging and self-presentation, while Baumeister and Leary’s 1995 framework explains the motivational importance of interpersonal connection.
Because scores may vary with current context and self-report accuracy, the displayed bands are result categories for this questionnaire, not established population norms or diagnostic cutoffs; they summarize reported social motives rather than stable characteristics.
- Priporova, E. A., & Agadullina, E. R. (2019). Social motives for using social networks: Analysis of user groups. Social Psychology and Society, 10(4), 96-111. 10.17759/sps.2019100407
- Nadkarni, A., & Hofmann, S. G. (2012). Why do people use Facebook? Personality and Individual Differences, 52(3), 243-249. 10.1016/j.paid.2011.11.007
- Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497-529. 10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
Updated: