Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
close relationships

Adult Attachment Questionnaire Test

Take the online Adult Attachment Questionnaire Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Adult Attachment Questionnaire Test here. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
With 17 questions completed in about 4 minutes, the Adult Attachment Questionnaire Test helps you reflect on anxiety and avoidance in close relationships. Its result highlights your relationship tendencies, offering a concise profile to support self-reflection about trust, intimacy, dependence, and fears of abandonment.
Questions: 174 minutes
Adult Attachment Questionnaire Test: situation and reply bubbles
October 2, 2025October 2, 2025Material has been updatedOctober 2, 2025Material has been published
30,485 views
3,389 completions
2,569 likes
Daniel HallPsychologist · Test reviewer
2,569 likes
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

AnxietyA
Measures how strongly a person tends to worry about acceptance and relationship stability in close romantic relationships.
example score23/63
23/63Low anxietyexample score
9 – 27Low anxiety
28 – 42Moderate anxiety
43 – 63High anxiety
A score of 23 falls in the Low anxiety range, suggesting generally low concern about abandonment or uncertainty in close relationships.
AvoidanceA
Measures the extent to which a person tends to keep emotional distance and avoid closeness in romantic relationships.
example score13/56
13/56Low avoidanceexample score
8 – 25Low avoidance
26 – 40Moderate avoidance
41 – 56High avoidance
A score of 13 falls in the Low avoidance range, suggesting little tendency to distance from emotional intimacy with a partner.
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

People in rocky relationships
41%OF USERS
They want to understand why closeness feels hard or why reassurance is never enough with their partner.
Therapy and counseling clients
34%OF USERS
They take it to quickly map their attachment patterns and have clearer topics to discuss in sessions.
Curious self-improvers
25%OF USERS
They’re single or dating and want insight into their typical reactions to intimacy, conflict, and commitment.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Shaded area — where most people score
Dot — the average
You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test
AnxietyA
You?
Average43.4
Typical rangeTypical36.2 – 50.6
Possible9 – 63
AvoidanceA
You?
Average26.9
Typical rangeTypical19.2 – 34.6
Possible8 – 56
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Somewhat disagree
    • Not sure
    • Somewhat agree
    • Agree
    • Strongly agree
    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Somewhat disagree
    • Not sure
    • Somewhat agree
    • Agree
    • Strongly agree
    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Somewhat disagree
    • Not sure
    • Somewhat agree
    • Agree
    • Strongly agree
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

Adult Attachment Questionnaire Test - Description and methodology of the test

close relationships
attachment

People who want to understand how they typically approach closeness can use this questionnaire to consider recurring relationship experiences. The Adult Attachment Questionnaire Test is designed for respondents who can answer from familiar patterns across relationships rather than from one isolated conflict. As an adult attachment assessment, it offers a structured starting point for noticing how responses may shift with context.

What This Assessment Explores

Attachment patterns are read as dimensions rather than fixed labels. The statements cover closeness, dependence, trust, reassurance, rejection, and reactions to distance.

The displayed result includes:

  • Anxiety (9-63) assesses anxious attachment, sometimes termed anxious-ambivalent, and a tendency to experience anxiety in close relationships: Low anxiety (9-27) indicates little to no anxiety, Moderate anxiety (28-42) indicates moderate anxiety, and High anxiety (43-63) indicates a pronounced tendency toward anxiety in close relationships.
  • Avoidance (8-56) assesses avoidant attachment: Low avoidance (8-25) indicates no tendency toward avoidance, Moderate avoidance (26-40) indicates a slight to moderate tendency, and High avoidance (41-56) indicates a pronounced tendency to avoid close relationships.
  • Closeness and dependence show how trust, reliance, intimacy, and discomfort with excessive closeness shape the profile.

The anxiety score can show whether worries about love or abandonment stand out in the attachment questionnaire results.

Methodology and Evidence Base

Each item uses a seven-point agreement scale; endpoint wording varies from Strongly disagree or Completely disagree to Strongly agree or Completely agree, with Not sure or Unsure near the midpoint. Statements ask how closely typical relationship thoughts, feelings, or behavior match the respondent, capturing degree rather than simple reactions.

The displayed result gives separate scores for the two dimensions within the supplied bands. An item-level scoring rule is not provided, so the ranges do not show how each response contributes. The avoidance score can indicate whether emotional distance or discomfort with dependence merits reflection in an attachment style assessment.

The 17-item form corresponds to the Adult Attachment Questionnaire reported by Simpson et al. (1996), making this online questionnaire a version of that instrument. Adult attachment theory, applied to romantic love by Hazan and Shaver (1987), supplies the framework. Fraley, Waller, and Brennan (2000) provide psychometric context but do not validate this online version.

Mood, context, memory, self-awareness, and impression management can affect self-report; read the profile as patterns to examine over time, not as a diagnosis.

Author: C. Hazan, P. R. Shaver
Literature:
  • Simpson, J. A., Rholes, W. S., & Phillips, D. (1996). Conflict in close relationships: An attachment perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(5), 899-914. 10.1037/0022-3514.71.5.899
  • Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. R. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511-524. 10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.511
  • Fraley, R. C., Waller, N. G., & Brennan, K. A. (2000). An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(2), 350-365. 10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.350

Updated:

Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment