Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
burnout

Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI) Test

Take the online Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI) Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI) Test here. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
Completed in about three minutes, the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI) Test uses 16 questions to explore exhaustion, energy, and distance from work. Your result can highlight patterns in workplace fatigue and engagement, helping you reflect on how current demands affect your recovery, motivation, and connection with your role.
Questions: 163 minutes
Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI): test ticket with numbers
October 2, 2025October 2, 2025Material has been updatedOctober 2, 2025Material has been published
31,312 views
3,491 completion
2,860 likes
Daniel HallPsychologist · Test reviewer
2,860 likes
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

Exhaustion / VigorE/V
This scale measures work-related fatigue (physical, emotional, and cognitive) versus the presence of vitality and resilience to meet job demands.
example score19/32
19/32Elevated exhaustionexample score
8 – 18Higher energy
19 – 32Elevated exhaustion
A score of 19 falls in the Elevated exhaustion range, suggesting noticeably increased fatigue and reduced energy compared with lower scores on this scale.
Disengagement / IdentificationD/I
This scale measures how emotionally detached versus identified and engaged a person feels with their work and organization.
example score19/32
19/32Detachmentexample score
8 – 17Identification
18 – 32Detachment
A score of 19 falls in the Detachment range, suggesting some emotional distancing from work compared with stronger identification and engagement.
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Overloaded professionals
41%OF USERS
People juggling heavy workloads or long hours who feel constantly tired, irritable, or less effective at work.
Detached or unmotivated workers
34%OF USERS
Employees who notice growing cynicism, emotional distance, or a drop in interest and meaning in their tasks.
HR and team leaders
25%OF USERS
Managers and HR specialists using a quick check-in to spot burnout risks and plan support or recovery steps for teams.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Shaded area — where most people score
Dot — the average
You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test
Exhaustion / EnergyE/E
You?
Average22.2
Typical rangeTypical18.3 – 26
Possible8 – 32
Detachment / IdentificationD/I
You?
Average25.2
Typical rangeTypical20.9 – 29.6
Possible8 – 32
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

    • Strongly agree
    • Agree
    • Disagree
    • Strongly disagree
    • Strongly agree
    • Agree
    • Disagree
    • Strongly disagree
    • Strongly agree
    • Agree
    • Disagree
    • Strongly disagree
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI) Test - Description and methodology of the test

burnout

Employees reflecting on sustained pressure at work may use this workplace burnout inventory to examine fatigue, recovery, energy, and connection with their role. It is intended for people examining how current demands affect work. The Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI) Test organizes those experiences into two dimensions rather than one overall judgment. Results can show whether strain is most visible in depleted energy, reduced involvement, or both.

What This Assessment Explores

The items cover tiredness before work, slow recovery, emotional depletion, energy left for leisure, interest, challenge, automatic performance, negative talk, and distance from the job. As an assessment of work exhaustion, it helps readers reflect on how demands affect work.

The result is organized into two paired dimensions:

  • Exhaustion / Vigor (8-32) indicates Higher energy (8-18), marked by internal energy, emotional stability, and high cognitive speed, or Elevated exhaustion (19-32), reflecting physical, emotional, and cognitive fatigue from a prolonged mismatch between demands and capacity.
  • Disengagement / Identification (8-32) indicates Identification (8-17), reflecting involvement and satisfaction, or Detachment (18-32), reflecting distance from work, reduced organizational identification, and lower job satisfaction.

Together, these outcomes show whether strain is more visible in energy and recovery, work connection, or both. Greater detachment may signal occupational burnout; read the profile alongside workload, rest, and recent changes.

Methodology and Scientific Basis

Each statement uses a four-point response: Strongly agree, Agree, Disagree, or Strongly disagree. The items point in different directions, and the online version does not state how individual responses are weighted or reversed. The displayed bands describe the resulting profile; the questionnaire does not state an item-by-item weighting rule, so the ranges alone cannot show any answer's exact contribution.

The published Oldenburg Burnout Inventory examines exhaustion and disengagement as distinct aspects of occupational burnout. An English construct-validity study of the OLBI examines these dimensions, while the job demands-resources model connects them with demands and resources at work. This online questionnaire is conceptually consistent with the published OLBI, but it is not a standardised version with established norms.

In this burnout self-assessment, the result is best read as structured reflection on current work experience. Responses may shift with workload, mood, recall, and self-awareness, so the profile is a time-sensitive indication of how work currently feels rather than a fixed measure of the person.

Author: A. B. Bakker, E. Demerouti
Literature:
  • Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Vardakou, I., & Kantas, A. (2003). The convergent validity of two burnout instruments: A multitrait-multimethod analysis. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 19(1), 12–23. 10.1027//1015-5759.19.1.12
  • Halbesleben, J. R. B., & Demerouti, E. (2005). The construct validity of an alternative measure of burnout: Investigating the English translation of the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory. Work & Stress, 19(3), 208–220. 10.1080/02678370500340728
  • Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 499–512. 10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499

Updated:

Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment