Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI) Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Strongly agree
- Agree
- Disagree
- Strongly disagree
- Strongly agree
- Agree
- Disagree
- Strongly disagree
- Strongly agree
- Agree
- Disagree
- Strongly disagree
Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI) Test - Description and methodology of the test
Employees reflecting on sustained pressure at work may use this workplace burnout inventory to examine fatigue, recovery, energy, and connection with their role. It is intended for people examining how current demands affect work. The Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI) Test organizes those experiences into two dimensions rather than one overall judgment. Results can show whether strain is most visible in depleted energy, reduced involvement, or both.
What This Assessment Explores
The items cover tiredness before work, slow recovery, emotional depletion, energy left for leisure, interest, challenge, automatic performance, negative talk, and distance from the job. As an assessment of work exhaustion, it helps readers reflect on how demands affect work.
The result is organized into two paired dimensions:
- Exhaustion / Vigor (8-32) indicates Higher energy (8-18), marked by internal energy, emotional stability, and high cognitive speed, or Elevated exhaustion (19-32), reflecting physical, emotional, and cognitive fatigue from a prolonged mismatch between demands and capacity.
- Disengagement / Identification (8-32) indicates Identification (8-17), reflecting involvement and satisfaction, or Detachment (18-32), reflecting distance from work, reduced organizational identification, and lower job satisfaction.
Together, these outcomes show whether strain is more visible in energy and recovery, work connection, or both. Greater detachment may signal occupational burnout; read the profile alongside workload, rest, and recent changes.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each statement uses a four-point response: Strongly agree, Agree, Disagree, or Strongly disagree. The items point in different directions, and the online version does not state how individual responses are weighted or reversed. The displayed bands describe the resulting profile; the questionnaire does not state an item-by-item weighting rule, so the ranges alone cannot show any answer's exact contribution.
The published Oldenburg Burnout Inventory examines exhaustion and disengagement as distinct aspects of occupational burnout. An English construct-validity study of the OLBI examines these dimensions, while the job demands-resources model connects them with demands and resources at work. This online questionnaire is conceptually consistent with the published OLBI, but it is not a standardised version with established norms.
In this burnout self-assessment, the result is best read as structured reflection on current work experience. Responses may shift with workload, mood, recall, and self-awareness, so the profile is a time-sensitive indication of how work currently feels rather than a fixed measure of the person.
- Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Vardakou, I., & Kantas, A. (2003). The convergent validity of two burnout instruments: A multitrait-multimethod analysis. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 19(1), 12–23. 10.1027//1015-5759.19.1.12
- Halbesleben, J. R. B., & Demerouti, E. (2005). The construct validity of an alternative measure of burnout: Investigating the English translation of the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory. Work & Stress, 19(3), 208–220. 10.1080/02678370500340728
- Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 499–512. 10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499
Updated: