Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
suicidal risk

Anti-Suicidal Motives Questionnaire Test

Take the online Anti-Suicidal Motives Questionnaire Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Anti-Suicidal Motives Questionnaire Test here. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
With 48 questions taking about 9 minutes, the Anti-Suicidal Motives Questionnaire Test examines motives and personal resources that may inhibit suicidal behavior. Your result highlights the relative importance of moral, social, family, survival, and fear-related factors, supporting structured self-reflection about protective influences and areas worth discussing.
Questions: 489 minutes
Anti-Suicidal Motives Questionnaire Test: situation and reply bubbles
October 2, 2025October 2, 2025Material has been updatedOctober 2, 2025Material has been published
17,935 views
1,351 completion
1,133 likes
Daniel HallPsychologist · Test reviewer
1,133 likes
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

Moral BeliefsMB
Measures how strongly moral and ethical convictions act as protective reasons against suicidal actions.
example score4/6
4/6Moderate to highexample score
1 – 1.88Low
1.89 – 6Moderate to high
A score of 4 falls in the Moderate to high range, suggesting moral values are a meaningful protective resource for avoiding suicidal actions.
Social DisapprovalSD
Measures how strongly fear of social disapproval and concern about others' opinions act as a barrier to suicidal behavior.
example score3/6
3/6Moderateexample score
1 – 2.13Low
2.14 – 6Moderate
A score of 3 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting social disapproval is a meaningful but not exclusive factor influencing the person’s motivation to avoid suicide.
Fear of SuicideFoS
Measures the intensity of fear and anxiety about carrying out suicidal actions, which can function as a protective restraint.
example score3/6
3/6Moderate to high fearexample score
1 – 1.66Low fear
1.67 – 6Moderate to high fear
A score of 3 falls in the moderate to high fear range, suggesting a noticeable level of anxiety about acting on suicidal thoughts that may help inhibit self-harm behavior.
Care for ChildrenCfC
Assesses how strongly caring for and feeling responsible toward one’s children serves as a motive to avoid suicidal behavior.
example score3/6
3/6Lowexample score
1 – 4.18Low
4.19 – 6High
A score of 3 falls in the Low range, suggesting caring for children is a relatively less prominent protective motive for this person compared with other possible reasons to choose life.
Responsibility to FamilyRtF
Measures how strongly a sense of responsibility toward family members serves as a reason to stay alive despite suicidal thoughts.
example score3/6
3/6Low family responsibility motiveexample score
1 – 4.17Low family responsibility motive
4.18 – 6High family responsibility motive
A score of 3 falls in the low range, suggesting family obligations are a relatively weak or less salient factor in inhibiting suicidal behavior for this person.
SurvivalS
Measures the strength of a person’s internal belief in preserving life and overcoming difficulties.
example score3/6
3/6Lowexample score
1 – 4.4Low
4.41 – 6High
A score of 3 indicates a lower survival motive, suggesting fewer strongly endorsed beliefs about needing to endure challenges and stay alive as a protective reason.
Anti-Suicidal Motives SeverityASMS
Measures the overall strength of motivations and resources that discourage suicidal behavior.
example score3/6
3/6Lowexample score
1 – 3.06Low
3.07 – 6High
A score of 3 falls in the Low range, suggesting relatively weaker anti-suicidal motivations compared with typical reference levels.
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Therapy and counseling clients
46%OF USERS
People in therapy who have had suicidal thoughts take it to clarify what helps them choose safety and life.
Clinicians screening risk
34%OF USERS
Psychologists, psychiatrists, and crisis workers use it to identify a patient’s protective motives and guide a support plan.
Teen support evaluations
20%OF USERS
Teens and those supporting them complete it to pinpoint values and relationships that reduce self-harm risk.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Shaded area — where most people score
Dot — the average
You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test
Moral ValuesMV
You?
Average2.3
Typical rangeTypical1.6 – 2.9
Possible1 – 6
Social DisapprovalSD
You?
Average4.7
Typical rangeTypical3.9 – 5.5
Possible1 – 6
Fear of Committing SuicideFoCS
You?
Average2.7
Typical rangeTypical1.7 – 3.6
Possible1 – 6
Caring for ChildrenCfC
You?
Average4
Typical rangeTypical3.3 – 4.8
Possible1 – 6
Responsibility to the FamilyRttF
You?
Average2.6
Typical rangeTypical1.6 – 3.5
Possible1 – 6
SurvivalS
You?
Average3.8
Typical rangeTypical3 – 4.6
Possible1 – 6
Intensity of anti-suicidal motivesIoam
You?
Average3.1
Typical rangeTypical2.3 – 3.8
Possible1 – 6
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

Many people have thought about suicide at least once. You will be presented with a series of statements about reasons why people do not die by suicide. Please rate the extent to which each statement reflects your current beliefs. Use the full range of response options rather than selecting only middle or only extreme responses. Please respond as honestly as possible.
    • Not at all important
    • Very slightly important
    • Slightly important
    • Important
    • Very important
    • Extremely important
    • Not at all important
    • Very slightly important
    • Slightly important
    • Important
    • Very important
    • Extremely important
    • Not at all important
    • Very unimportant
    • Unimportant
    • Important
    • Very important
    • Extremely important
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

Anti-Suicidal Motives Questionnaire Test - Description and methodology of the test

suicidal risk
vital motivation

People reflecting on what helps them continue living may use the Anti-Suicidal Motives Questionnaire Test as a structured self-reflection tool. An anti-suicidal motives questionnaire clarifies which personal, relational, moral, and emotional influences feel most important during severe distress. The result offers a profile of protective motives and possible areas for thoughtful discussion, rather than a verdict about character or worth.

What This Assessment Measures

Motives that may inhibit suicidal behavior are grouped into moral, social, family, fear-related, and survival themes. Higher scores indicate greater importance of the named motive. The anti-suicidal motives test presents seven catalogue scales:

  • Moral Beliefs (1-6) reflects moral inhibition: Low 1-1.88; Moderate to high 1.89-6.
  • Social Disapproval (1-6) reflects deterrence from social judgment: Low 1-2.13; Moderate 2.14-6.
  • Fear of Suicide (1-6) reflects fear as protection: Low fear 1-1.66; Moderate to high fear 1.67-6.
  • Care for Children (1-6) reflects parental responsibility: Low 1-4.18; High 4.19-6.
  • Responsibility to Family (1-6) reflects family obligation: Low family responsibility motive 1-4.17; High family responsibility motive 4.18-6.
  • Survival (1-6) reflects motivation to preserve life: Low 1-4.4; High 4.41-6.
  • Anti-Suicidal Motives Severity (1-6) reflects overall protective strength: Low 1-3.06; High 3.07-6.

Methodology and Evidence Base

Each statement asks how important a motive is, using a six-point ordered response format from not at all important to extremely important. Scores are reported across the catalogue dimensions. The questionnaire does not define a separate point contribution for each answer, so interpretation should follow the displayed scale scores rather than an invented conversion rule.

Conceptually, its structure aligns with the Reasons for Living Inventory (Linehan et al., 1983), which treats reasons for living as protective commitments. Chistopolskaya’s 2017 adaptation study and Zhuravleva’s 2018 study address related instruments and suicidal-behavior samples. Shneidman provides compatible context for suicidal thinking, but this online version is not thereby a standardized reproduction of one published instrument.

Interpretation of an anti-suicidal motives assessment considers the pattern and the global index: higher values mean a motive is rated as more important, not that wellbeing is stronger in every respect. The catalogue describes the global score as a mean compared with normative and clinical samples; its bands provide the displayed interpretation. Self-report may shift with current distress, self-awareness, and social desirability, so the profile needs context beyond a single score.

Author: Edwin S. Shneidman, Thomas E. Joiner
Literature:
  • Ksenia A. Chistopolskaya, Tatiana V. Zhuravleva, Sergey N. Enikolopov, and Evgeni L. Nikolaev. (2017). Adaptation of Diagnostic Instruments for Suicidal Aspects of Personality. Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 14(1), 61-87. 10.17323/1813-8918-2017-1-61-87
  • Tatyana V. Zhuravleva, Sergey N. Enikolopov, Nikolay V. Dvoryanchikov, and Yuriy A. Bubeev. (2018). Adaptation of Methods for Studying Suicidal Behavior in a Sample of People with Suicide Attempts. Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, 7(3), 96-108. 10.17759/jmfp.2018070309
  • Marsha M. Linehan, Judith L. Goodstein, Stevan L. Nielsen, and John A. Chiles. (1983). Reasons for Staying Alive When You Are Thinking of Killing Yourself: The Reasons for Living Inventory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51(2), 276-286. 10.1037/0022-006X.51.2.276
  • Edwin S. Shneidman. (1996). The Suicidal Mind. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195103663.001.0001

Updated:

Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment