Achievement Motivation and Fear of Failure Scale Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Yes
- No
- Yes
- No
- Yes
- No
Achievement Motivation and Fear of Failure Scale Test - Description and methodology of the test
Readers who want to understand why they pursue difficult goals, persist after setbacks, or avoid responsibility can use the Achievement Motivation and Fear of Failure Scale Test as a focused self-report profile. By showing whether approach-oriented striving or concern about failure is more prominent in the current pattern, the achievement motivation test gives the result a practical focus. The result supports reflection on goal setting, initiative, and persistence.
What This Assessment Explores
This questionnaire examines the balance between moving toward success and protecting oneself from failure. Items address optimism, initiative, persistence, future planning, reactions to obstacles, preferred difficulty, risk judgment, and performance under time pressure. They show how a respondent approaches challenging responsibilities.
It also asks whether failure reduces a task’s appeal, whether performance relies on one’s own goal-directedness rather than external supervision, and whether persistence continues without that supervision. As a fear of failure assessment, it captures avoidance alongside confidence and goal-directed action.
The Motivational Scale (0-20) is interpreted through three displayed bands:
- Failure-avoidant (0-8) indicates that anxiety and avoidance may outweigh approach-oriented striving.
- Balanced (9-13) reflects a relatively even pull between pursuing achievement and avoiding failure.
- Success-oriented (14-20) indicates stronger confidence, initiative, and persistence in goal striving.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each item uses a Yes/No response, asking respondents to endorse or reject a statement reflecting usual behavior. Answers combine into one motivational result, with no separate subscores. Despite its concise structure, the questionnaire covers approach and avoidance sides of achievement behavior.
Its closest conceptual reference is Motivation for Success and Fear of Failure, discussed by Artur Rean in 1999. The framework is consistent with the achievement-motive model developed by David McClelland, John Atkinson, Russell Clark, and Edgar Lowell. Atkinson’s 1957 work explains how motive strength, perceived difficulty, and risk-taking shape task choice.
A 2024 study by Medina Brakamonte and colleagues examines success motivation, perfectionism, and procrastination among adult students. The questionnaire is conceptually consistent with Rean’s Motivation for Success and Fear of Failure and achievement-motive theory; this does not establish the online form was adapted or validated. For interpretation, it functions as a success motivation test with the catalogue’s three displayed categories for the overall motivational score. Self-reported responses can be influenced by current mood, self-awareness, and the wish to present oneself favorably.
- Rean, Artur A. (1999). The Study of Personality Motivation. In Psychology of Studying the Personality: A Textbook (pp. 9–20). Saint Petersburg: Mikhailov Publishing House.
- Medina Brakamonte, Natalya A., Elena M. Kitaeva, Daniel D. Medina Brakamonte, and Irina Yu. Chubun. (2024). Personal disposition to perfectionism and procrastination as a factor for motivation toward success: Adult students’ case. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology, 14(4), 731–742. 10.21638/spbu16.2024.410
- McClelland, David C., John W. Atkinson, Russell A. Clark, and Edgar L. Lowell. (1953). The Achievement Motive. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
- Atkinson, John W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. Psychological Review, 64(6, Part 1), 359–372. 10.1037/h0043445
Updated: