Motives for Child Conception Questionnaire Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Strongly agree
- Agree rather than disagree
- Hard to say
- Disagree rather than agree
- Strongly disagree
- Strongly agree
- Somewhat agree
- Not sure
- Somewhat disagree
- Strongly disagree
- Strongly agree
- Agree somewhat
- Not sure
- Disagree somewhat
- Strongly disagree
Motives for Child Conception Questionnaire Test - Description and methodology of the test
People considering parenthood can use the Motives for Child Conception Questionnaire Test to examine what the wish for a child represents in their lives. It is suited to adults reflecting on personal priorities, relationships, family expectations, and their motives for parenthood. The questionnaire turns a broad wish for parenthood into a profile of distinct motives that can support more focused reflection with a partner.
What This Assessment Explores
The items explore reasons for linking parenthood with emotion, identity, relationships, and family life. Within this assessment of motives for having a child, a higher dimension score means that theme is more prominent in the answers, not that it is universally preferable. Dimensions are:
- Responsibility Motive (0-12) reflects parental duty.
- Happiness Motive (0-12) reflects expected joy.
- Care and Love Motive (0-12) reflects emotional care.
- Family Cohesion Motive (0-12) reflects hoped-for unity; Family Completeness Motive (0-12) reflects family wholeness.
- Meaning of Life Motive (0-12) reflects purpose through parenthood.
- Motherhood Motive (0-12) reflects a woman's internal need for self-realization in the maternal role.
- Lineage Continuation Motive (0-12) reflects descendants and tradition.
Displayed bands are responsibility: Lower responsibility focus 0-4, Moderate responsibility focus 5-8, High responsibility focus 9-12; other 0-12 dimensions: Low 0-4, Moderate 5-8, High 9-12; lineage: Low 0-3, Moderate 4-8, High 9-12.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each statement uses five response choices from strong agreement to strong disagreement, with a middle uncertainty option. Items cover happiness, care, duty, identity, family unity, completeness, purpose, and lineage. Answers are grouped into motive dimensions, producing separate scores rather than one overall parenthood score. The questionnaire serves as a childbearing motivation test by mapping which motives are most prominent.
Miller's 1995 work on childbearing motivation and measurement offers the closest named comparison for reasons people give for having children. Miller's 1994 framework and Langdridge, Sheeran, and Connolly's 2005 study likewise distinguish varied reasons for parenthood. The questionnaire is conceptually consistent with these works, while its status as an adaptation or validated version of a published instrument is unspecified.
Because its item-to-point conversion is not stated, no scoring formula, normative basis, or clinical cutoff is specified for the displayed bands. Scores may reflect current circumstances, relationship dynamics, cultural expectations, pregnancy-related feelings, or socially desirable responding. The profile is not a diagnostic assessment and cannot predict future family outcomes; it describes reported motives rather than a person's overall circumstances.
- Miller, W. B. (1995). Childbearing motivation and its measurement. Journal of Biosocial Science, 27(4), 473-487. 10.1017/S0021932000023087
- Langdridge, D., Sheeran, P., & Connolly, K. (2005). Understanding the reasons for parenthood. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 23(2), 121-133. 10.1080/02646830500129438
- Miller, W. B. (1994). Childbearing motivations, desires, and intentions: A theoretical framework. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 120(2), 223-258.
Updated: