Internal Freedom Scale Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Yes
- No
- Yes
- No
- Yes
- No
Internal Freedom Scale Test - Description and methodology of the test
For anyone examining how much personal control they feel in everyday life, the Internal Freedom Scale Test offers a structured way to consider autonomy, responsibility, and reactions to circumstance. This internal freedom assessment may help readers notice whether decisions are guided mainly by personal judgment, perceived chance, or the expectations of other people.
What This Assessment Explores
The questionnaire explores how a person explains events and responds when outcomes are uncertain. Its statements address luck and fate, effort, relationships, work and school, leadership, recognition, and perceived power to change circumstances.
The result of this internal control assessment describes a tendency rather than a fixed identity: lower scores suggest more reliance on external circumstances or other people’s influence, while higher scores suggest personal agency and independent judgment. Middle results may reflect tension between autonomy and social expectations.
The Level of Internal Freedom scale (0-40) is shown in three bands:
- Low inner freedom (0-14) indicates that events may be explained through circumstances or other people’s actions.
- Mixed/average (15-25) suggests balance or conflict between self-direction and meeting external expectations.
- High inner freedom (26-40) indicates stronger autonomy and a greater tendency to connect outcomes with personal choices and efforts.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
The questionnaire uses short statements answered Yes or No, framed around personal beliefs and everyday situations. The sample contrasts effort with luck, fate, other people, and changing circumstances, while touching on control in relationships, work, school, management, and problem-solving.
The questionnaire reports one displayed result using the three bands listed above. Its scoring formula and population norms are not stated, so the categories are descriptive rather than norm-referenced.
The questionnaire is conceptually consistent with Rotter’s internal-versus-external locus-of-control model and the Subjective Control Questionnaire, but is not presented as a direct adaptation. The Subjective Control Questionnaire (Bazhin et al., 1984) is the closest conceptual counterpart, examining perceived control across life situations; a later 1993 publication by the same authors offers related evidence about subjective control but is not presented as the source of this online questionnaire.
Interpretation of this autonomy questionnaire is strongest alongside current context and answers. Self-report can shift with mood, self-awareness, or impression management.
- Bazhin, E. F., Golynkina, E. A., & Etkind, A. M. (1984). The Method for Studying the Level of Subjective Control. Psychological Journal, 5(3), 152-162.
- Bazhin, E. F., Golynkina, E. A., & Etkind, A. M. (1993). Questionnaire of the Level of Subjective Control. Moscow: Smysl.
- Rotter, Julian B. (1966). Generalized Expectancies for Internal versus External Control of Reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80(1), 1-28. 10.1037/h0092976
Updated: