Express Assessment of Teachers' Pedagogical Orientation Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Yes
- No
- Yes
- No
- Yes
- No
Express Assessment of Teachers' Pedagogical Orientation Test - Description and methodology of the test
Teachers who want to reflect on the values and working habits they bring to instruction may find this profile useful, especially when considering classroom priorities, professional development, or relationships with learners and colleagues. The Express Assessment of Teachers' Pedagogical Orientation Test organizes those reflections into several complementary directions. As a teacher orientation assessment, it describes tendencies rather than ranking one style as universally best.
What This Assessment Explores
Questions address knowledge, morality, independence, order, group life, subject learning, and concern for others. Together, these themes form an orientation profile, not a measure of teaching quality. The teaching orientation profile shows which directions are prominent in the respondent's self-description.
The scales are:
- Intellectual (0-10) measures orientation toward enlightenment, high intellectual functioning, and spiritual values; higher scores reflect stronger striving to develop and transmit cultural and intellectual values, while lower scores indicate less pronounced qualities; Low 0-4, Moderate 5-8, High 9-10.
- Subject Orientation (0-10) measures interest in the taught subject; higher results indicate stronger engagement; Low 0-2, Moderate 3-6, High 7-10.
- Organizer (0-10) measures planning, coordination, and instructional structure; higher results indicate stronger organization; Low 0-2, Moderate 3-6, High 7-10.
- Communicator (0-10) measures interpersonal engagement in professional and personal contexts; higher results indicate stronger communication; Low 0-3, Moderate 4-7, High 8-10.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each statement uses a Yes/No response, asking for self-description rather than graded performance, direct observation, or an external rating of teaching behavior. Professional preferences and everyday interpersonal tendencies are grouped into the four displayed scales, connecting self-description with teaching-related priorities and classroom interaction. The questionnaire's scoring key determines each answer's contribution; the visible ranges alone do not reveal the point allocation.
The online pedagogical orientation questionnaire is conceptually consistent with MADPNAU (Koreljakov, 1997), a rapid assessment of teachers' pedagogical orientation, but is not presented as an adaptation of it; its own standardization and validation status is not established. Rogov (1995) supplies related educational psychology context for motives, subject commitment, organization, and interaction.
Interpret bands comparatively: a high result marks a more pronounced direction, while a low result means that direction is less evident in the responses. The displayed bands do not establish population norms or clinical cutoffs. Current context, role, mood, and candor can affect self-report, so use the profile for structured reflection rather than diagnosis or a stand-alone judgment of teaching competence.
- Koreljakov, Yuriy A. (1997). Method of Rapid Diagnostics of Teacher's Pedagogical Orientation (MADPNAU). Psychological Science and Education, 2(2), Article 11. 10.17759/pse
- Rogov, Evgeny Ivanovich. (1995). Handbook of the Practical Psychologist in Education: A Training Manual. Moscow: Vlados. ISBN 5-87065-045-3
Updated: