Illness Social Significance Self-Assessment Questionnaire Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Definitely not
- Probably not
- Not sure
- Probably yes
- Definitely yes
- Definitely not
- Probably not
- Not sure
- Probably yes
- Definitely yes
- Definitely not
- Probably not
- Not sure
- Probably yes
- Definitely yes
Illness Social Significance Self-Assessment Questionnaire Test - Description and methodology of the test
For people who want to understand how a health condition affects everyday roles and relationships, the Illness Social Significance Self-Assessment Questionnaire Test offers a structured way to examine perceived consequences. This illness impact self-assessment suits people reflecting on financial pressure, work, family life, appearance, energy, pleasure, and social contact. Its result highlights areas that feel most affected.
What This Assessment Explores
The questionnaire examines the social significance of illness: the way a condition can change material security, work, self-image, energy, enjoyment, communication, and relationships. Viewed as a social significance of illness questionnaire, it focuses on perceived effects rather than disease severity or treatment response, making it useful for people reflecting on changed daily participation.
Its dimensions connect practical restrictions with emotional and social consequences. Financial pressure appears alongside career barriers, workplace strain, family difficulty, appearance concerns, self-worth concerns, lower vitality, limited leisure, reduced enjoyment, and less contact with others. This profile helps show which parts of ordinary life feel most disrupted.
Higher results indicate a stronger perceived effect in the relevant domain. The pattern can organize self-reflection and support a conversation about priorities, support, and adjustment, while distinguishing changes linked to illness from the person’s experience of them.
Methodology and Evidence Base
Five response options yield 0-5 scores; higher values indicate greater impact. Bands:
- Financial Loss (0-5), Reduced Physical Attractiveness (0-5), Inability to Pursue a Career (0-5), and Perceived Loss of Strength and Energy (0-5) show financial, appearance, career and vitality; bands: Low impact 0-1, Moderate impact 2-3, and High impact 4-5.
- Development of Feelings of Inferiority (0-5), Leisure Time Restriction (0-5), and Withdrawal From Pleasures (0-5) show inferiority, recreation, enjoyment; bands: Low/Low limitation/Minimal limits 0-1, Moderate/Moderate limitation/Noticeable limits 2-3, and High/High limitation/Strong limits 4-5.
- Deterioration of Workplace Relationships (0-5), Deterioration of Family Relationships (0-5), and Social Interaction Restriction (0-5) show workplace, family, contact; bands: Minimal impact/Minimal impact/Minimal restriction 0-1, Noticeable impact/Moderate difficulties/Moderate restriction 2-3, and Strong impact/Severe difficulties/Severe restriction 4-5.
Serdyuk Questionnaire (1994) is the closest source. Leventhal’s Common-Sense Model and Sharova-Vazhenin provide context; it is not adapted from them. Self-report and current context shape this illness consequences assessment.
- Mikhailov, B. V., Serdyuk, A. I., & Fedoseev, V. A. (2002). Psychotherapy in General Somatic Medicine: A Clinical Guide. Kharkiv: Prapor, 128 pp.
- Sharova, O. N., & Vazhenin, A. V. (2017). Values in the Biopsychosocial Rehabilitation Model of Persons with Oncological Diseases. Palliative Medicine and Rehabilitation, no. 4, pp. 32-38.
- Leventhal, H., Meyer, D., & Nerenz, D. (1980). The Common Sense Representation of Illness Danger. In S. Rachman (Ed.), Contributions to Medical Psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 7-30). New York: Pergamon Press.
- Leventhal, H., Phillips, L. A., & Burns, E. (2016). The Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation (CSM): A Dynamic Framework for Understanding Illness Self-Management. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 39(6), 935-946. 10.1007/s10865-016-9782-2
Updated: