Adolescent Crisis Symptom Severity Questionnaire Test
How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- No
- Rather no than yes
- Rather yes than no
- Yes
- No
- No, rather than yes
- Yes, rather than no
- Yes
- No
- More likely no than yes
- More likely yes than no
- Yes
Adolescent Crisis Symptom Severity Questionnaire Test - Description and methodology of the test
Parents, caregivers, and practitioners deciding whether an observer questionnaire would clarify concerns about a teenager can use this assessment to organize observations. The Adolescent Crisis Symptom Severity Questionnaire Test gives them a consistent framework for considering adjustment during a period of change. Because this adolescent adjustment questionnaire relies on an observer who knows the young person well, it works best when that respondent can describe behavior across settings.
What This Assessment Explores
Reflection, hobbies, autonomy, belonging, resistance, imitation, inadequacy, and crisis severity define this profile. The adolescent crisis questionnaire reports tendencies.
Scales include:
- Interest in the Inner World (0-12) measures self-reflection; Hobby-Related Reactions (0-12) measures hobbies and coping: Low engagement 0-4, Moderate engagement 5-8, High engagement 9-12.
- Spatial Autonomy (0-12) measures privacy; Behavioral Emancipation (0-12) measures independent action; Normative Emancipation (0-12) measures autonomy; Emotional Emancipation (0-12) measures emotional independence.
- Grouping Reaction (0-12) measures peer affiliation; Overcompensation Reaction (0-12) measures activity or strength displays; Oppositional Reaction (0-12) measures resistance to authority; Imitation Response (0-12) measures imitation and identity searching.
- Affect of Inadequacy (0-12) measures insecurity and incompetence; Overall Crisis Index (0-100) measures crisis severity and adaptation difficulty.
0-12 scales use Low 0-4, Moderate 5-8, and High 9-12; the index uses Low 0-33, Moderate 34-66, and High 67-100.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each statement asks an observer to choose one of four ordered responses, from No to Yes; middle options express degree. Items concern development, relationships, autonomy, interests, and reactions, so answers form a pattern. Answers contribute to the pattern rather than standing alone.
Thematic scores and an overall index organize results. Bands show levels but do not disclose item weights or establish clinical cutoffs. Displayed dimensions let readers notice relative patterns without assigning validated meaning to convergence or divergence.
The adolescent crisis assessment format captures a moment, so interpretation should include current circumstances. The questionnaire is conceptually consistent with Melnikova and Vasilenko’s 2025 work on adolescent crisis symptom severity; its online format is not a documented adaptation of that work. That framework supplies conceptual context, not norms or validation for the online version.
Observer ratings depend on the respondent’s honest, informed judgment and may reflect family conflict, expectations, or limited access to private experiences, so the profile indicates reported patterns rather than a diagnosis.
- Melnikova, E.S., and Vasilenko, V.E. (2025). The Role of Character Accentuations in Adolescent Crisis Severity Psychological Functioning in Late Adolescence. St. Petersburg Psychological Journal, no. 51, pp. 58-102.
- Vasilenko, V.E. (2025). Age- and Gender-Specific Patterns of Adolescent Crisis Manifestations. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, vol. 14, no. 2 (54), pp. 142-158. 10.18500/2304-9790-2025-14-2-142-158.
- Vasilenko, V.E., and Manukyan, V.R. (2011). Age Crises of the Life Cycle: A Practical Manual. Saint Petersburg: Saint Petersburg State University Press. 96 pp.
- Vasilenko, V.E., and Bannova, A.A. (2024). Manifestations of Adolescent and Youth Crises in Connection with the Parameters of Creativity. In V.A. Mazilov and Yu.N. Slepko (Eds.), Activity. Abilities. Inner World: Collection of Materials of the All-Russian Scientific Psychological Conference Dedicated to the 85th Anniversary of Academician of the Russian Academy of Education V.D. Shadrikov, Vol. 2, pp. 40-43. Yaroslavl: Yaroslavl State Pedagogical University.
Updated: