Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire (BPAQ) Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Not at all like me
- Not very much like me
- Neither like nor unlike me, not sure
- Somewhat like me
- Very much like me
- Not like me at all
- Not very much like me
- Somewhere in between, not sure
- Somewhat like me
- Very much like me
- Not at all like me
- Not very much like me
- Somewhere in between, not sure
- Somewhat like me
- Very much like me
Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire (BPAQ) Test - Description and methodology of the test
People who want a structured look at recurring conflict reactions can use this questionnaire to examine how aggression appears in thought, emotion, speech, and action. The Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire (BPAQ) Test is suited to people seeking a clearer profile of their responses, especially when irritability, distrust, arguments, or retaliatory impulses are hard to separate. As an aggression self-assessment, it organizes these patterns into interpretable dimensions.
What This Assessment Explores
Rather than reducing aggression to physical acts, the Buss-Perry aggression questionnaire separates verbal aggression, hostility, anger, and physical aggression. Results can show whether a respondent’s conflict pattern is more connected with speech, force, emotional arousal, or distrust and resentment. This profile suits self-reflection on recurring interpersonal reactions rather than labeling one incident.
The displayed profile is organized into five result dimensions:
- Verbal Aggression (5-25) measures aggressive verbal expression; Low 5-9, Moderate 10-17, High 18-25.
- Hostility (8-40) reflects distrust, resentment, and negative expectations; Low 8-11, Moderate 12-25, High 26-40.
- Anger (7-35) captures emotional arousal and readiness for outbursts; Low 7-10, Moderate 11-24, High 25-35.
- Physical Aggression (9-45) indicates a tendency toward physical force; Low 9-11, Moderate 12-24, High 25-45.
- Total Aggression Score (29-145) sums the four subscales; Low 29-45, Moderate 46-86, High 87-145.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each item uses five response positions, from not at all like me to very much like me, although some choices are framed as true, characteristic, or uncertain. The items cover physical force, threats, arguments, temper, distrust, jealousy, perceived unfairness, and assumptions about other people’s motives. They ask for a typical self-description rather than one isolated episode.
Responses are combined into subscale scores and an overall index under the four-component model described in the Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire. Later work by Bryant and Smith refined its measurement model, while Becker examined unresolved questions about its structure and use. This online questionnaire is conceptually consistent with those works, but it is not automatically equivalent to their samples, norms, or administration conditions.
This questionnaire produces a structured self-report profile that can support aggression assessment. The displayed result bands are descriptive, not universal clinical thresholds or population norms for this online questionnaire. Current mood, recent conflict, self-presentation, and self-awareness can affect answers, so the score describes reported tendencies at completion and does not establish a diagnosis.
- Buss, A. H., & Perry, M. (1992). The aggression questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(3), 452-459. 10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.452
- Bryant, F. B., & Smith, B. D. (2001). Refining the architecture of aggression: A measurement model for the Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 35(2), 138-167. 10.1006/jrpe.2000.2302
- Becker, G. (2007). The Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire: Some unfinished business. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(2), 434-452. 10.1016/j.jrp.2006.05.004
Updated: