Online Dating Service Use Motives Questionnaire Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Somewhat disagree
- Neither agree nor disagree
- Somewhat agree
- Agree
- Strongly agree
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Somewhat disagree
- Neither agree nor disagree
- Somewhat agree
- Agree
- Strongly agree
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Somewhat disagree
- Neither agree nor disagree
- Somewhat agree
- Agree
- Strongly agree
Online Dating Service Use Motives Questionnaire Test - Description and methodology of the test
People whose intentions shift with mood, circumstances, or relationship history may find the dating test useful for examining those mixed motives. Looking at online dating choices in context can help a reader notice tensions between seeking connection, validation, novelty, sexual contact, practical benefit, or relief after a breakup. The result offers a way to interpret current priorities without reducing them to a single reason.
What This Assessment Explores
The following dating motivations appear as separate result dimensions:
- Material Motivation (1-7) shows the importance of financial support or material gain: Low 1-1.64; Moderate 1.65-4.99; High 5-7.
- Breakup Recovery From Ex-Partners (1-7) reflects moving on after a breakup: Low 1-2.1; Moderate to high 2.2-7.
- Entertainment (1-7) indicates leisure and enjoyment: Low entertainment focus 1-2.89; High entertainment focus 2.9-7.
- Expanding One's Social Network (1-7) measures desire for new contacts: Low 1-4.3; High 4.4-7.
- Sex (1-7) measures priority given to sexual contacts: Low 1-3.73; High 3.74-7.
- Seeking a Serious Relationship (1-7) measures long-term partnership goals: Low 1-4.99; High 5-7.
- Social Approval (1-7) captures the need for recognition: Low need for recognition 1-2.8; High need for recognition 2.9-7.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
The questionnaire groups items by motive rather than by a single overall attitude. Each statement asks how strongly the respondent agrees, using a seven-point response format from disagreement to agreement; a few labels use completely or neutral, but the scale remains ordered from 1 to 7. The profile should therefore be read as a pattern across motive areas, not as one total score.
Its nearest conceptual reference is the 2023 methodology by Vorobieva, Shmidt, and Nestik, and the present questionnaire is conceptually consistent with that work. The Tinder Motives Scale (TMS) offers a related published framework for organizing reasons for app use. In this online dating questionnaire, separate motive scores use the displayed bands as descriptive result categories for interpreting the pattern across dimensions.
Honest answers matter because self-report can reflect mood, recent experiences, expectations, or the wish to present oneself favorably. Results are most useful as a snapshot of current priorities; they can guide reflection on choices and contexts, but they do not establish a diagnosis or explain relationship behavior on their own.
- Vorobieva, A. E., Shmidt, D. A., & Nestik, T. A. (2023). Russian-Language Adaptation of the Methodology for Diagnosing Motives for Using Online Dating Services. Psychological Journal, 44(2), 75-88. 10.31857/S020595920024909-5
- Timmermans, E., & De Caluwé, E. (2017). Development and validation of the Tinder Motives Scale (TMS). Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 341-350. 10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.028
Updated: