Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
cyberpsychology

Online Dating Service Use Motives Questionnaire Test

Take the online Online Dating Service Use Motives Questionnaire Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Online Dating Service Use Motives Questionnaire Testhere. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
Understand what drives someone to use online dating in about 5 minutes. A brief 22 question format identifies key user types, supporting better counseling, research, and product decisions.
Start Online Test
Questions: 225 minutes
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
October 2, 2025
Material has been published
16,094 views
918 completions
754 likes
Verified by Daniel Hall
Psychologist with 25 years of experience
Share
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score
5/7
Material Motivation (MM)
This scale measures how strongly material considerations (e.g., financial support or tangible benefits) motivate a person to use online dating services.
Low
Moderate
High
11.64: Low | 1.654.99: Moderate | 57: High
A score of 5 falls in the High range, suggesting material motives are a notable factor in your use of online dating services.
example score
4/7
Breakup Recovery From Ex-Partners (BRFEP)
Measures the extent to which a person uses online dating to cope with a past breakup and emotionally move on from an ex-partner.
Low
Moderate to high
12.1: Low | 2.27: Moderate to high
A score of 4 falls in the moderate-to-high range, suggesting online dating is at least partly being used as a way to recover from a previous relationship and shift focus away from an ex.
example score
5/7
Entertainment (E)
This scale measures the extent to which a person uses online dating primarily for entertainment, pleasure, and leisure activity.
Low entertainment focus
High entertainment focus
12.89: Low entertainment focus | 2.97: High entertainment focus
A score of 5 falls in the High entertainment focus range, suggesting online dating is used mainly for enjoyment and leisure rather than strictly goal-directed purposes.
example score
6/7
Expanding One's Social Network (EOSN)
Measures motivation to broaden one’s social circle by forming new contacts through online dating.
Low
High
14.3: Low | 4.47: High
A score of 6 indicates a strong orientation toward meeting new people and actively expanding your social connections through online dating.
example score
4/7
Sex (S)
This scale measures the strength of motivation to seek sexual encounters through online dating services.
Low
High
13.73: Low | 3.747: High
A score of 4 falls in the High range, suggesting sexual goals are a relatively prominent motivation for using online dating services.
example score
4/7
Seeking a Serious Relationship (SaSR)
Measures how strongly a person is motivated to pursue a long-term, committed relationship through online dating.
Low
High
14.99: Low | 57: High
A score of 4 falls in the Low range, suggesting a relatively weaker priority on seeking a stable, long-term partnership compared with other possible motivations.
example score
6/7
Social Approval (SA)
This scale measures the extent to which a person uses online dating to seek approval, recognition, and positive feedback from others.
Low need for recognition
High need for recognition
12.8: Low need for recognition | 2.97: High need for recognition
A score of 6 indicates a strong tendency to value social approval and positive feedback as a motivation for using online dating.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Curious dating platform users
41%OF USERS
People who want to understand their own reasons for using online dating and what they’re actually looking for right now.
Relationship-seekers and daters
34%OF USERS
People preparing to start or restart dating who want clarity on whether they’re aiming for a serious relationship, a quick date, or just communication.
Psychologists and researchers
25%OF USERS
Specialists who assess user motivations to tailor консультации, run studies, or analyze behavior patterns in online dating.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Material Motivation (MM)
Material Motivation (MM)
Average
4.3
Normal range
3.35.3
min.
1
max.
7
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Breaking Up with Exes (BUwE)
Breaking Up with Exes (BUwE)
Average
3.8
Normal range
3.14.6
min.
1
max.
7
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Entertainment (E)
Entertainment (E)
Average
3.6
Normal range
2.84.4
min.
1
max.
7
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Expanding Your Social Circle (EYSC)
Expanding Your Social Circle (EYSC)
Average
3.9
Normal range
34.7
min.
1
max.
7
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Sex (S)
Sex (S)
Average
3.7
Normal range
2.84.6
min.
1
max.
7
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Seeking a Serious Relationship (SaSR)
Seeking a Serious Relationship (SaSR)
Average
3.1
Normal range
2.43.9
min.
1
max.
7
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Social Recognition (SR)
Social Recognition (SR)
Average
4.4
Normal range
3.55.3
min.
1
max.
7
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Somewhat disagree
    • Neither agree nor disagree
    • Somewhat agree
    • Agree
    • Strongly agree
    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Somewhat disagree
    • Neither agree nor disagree
    • Somewhat agree
    • Agree
    • Strongly agree
    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Somewhat disagree
    • Neither agree nor disagree
    • Somewhat agree
    • Agree
    • Strongly agree
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment
Motivations for Using Online Dating Services Test

Online Dating Service Use Motives Questionnaire Test - Symptoms and Signs

cyberpsychology
relationships
social networks

This measure assesses reasons individuals engage with online dating platforms and how those motives relate to their use patterns. The Online Dating Service Use Motives Questionnaire is intended for brief self-report evaluation in research or clinical intake contexts. It was developed by J. T. Cacioppo and E. T. Finkel.

The instrument includes 22 items and typically requires about 5 minutes to complete. Results from the Online Dating Service Use Motives Questionnaire are generally interpreted as indicators of the respondent’s primary motivational themes for using online dating services, supporting formulation or hypothesis generation rather than serving as a stand-alone diagnostic tool.

Author: E. T. Finkel, J. T. Cacioppo, P. R. Shaver
Literature: Finkel, E. J., Eastwick, P. W., Karney, B. R., Reis, H. T., & Sprecher, S. Online dating: A critical analysis from the perspective of psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest. 2012.; Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. Online communication and adolescent well-being: Testing the stimulation versus the displacement hypothesis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2007.; Timmermans, E., & De Caluwé, E. Development and validation of the Tinder Motives Scale (TMS). Computers in Human Behavior. 2017.
Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment