Sex Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Strongly disagree
- Somewhat disagree rather than agree
- Not sure
- Somewhat agree rather than disagree
- Strongly agree
- Strongly disagree
- Somewhat disagree
- Not sure
- Somewhat agree
- Strongly agree
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree somewhat
- Not sure
- Agree somewhat
- Strongly agree
Sex Test - Description and methodology of the test
People who want to understand what sexual intimacy represents to them may use this sex test as a structured reflection exercise. As a sexual personality test, it looks beyond desire, asking how pleasure, affection, reassurance, control, comfort, and recognition may shape intimate choices. The result offers a personal profile rather than a single label, making it useful for noticing patterns you may examine further.
What This Assessment Explores
For readers wanting a sex personality test, this profile maps motives. Scores show stronger endorsement, not a ranking. The dimensions are:
- Reproduction (1-5) measures procreation: Low 1-2.3; Moderate 2.4-3.6; High 3.7-5.
- Pleasure (1-5) measures enjoyment: Low 1-2.3; Moderate 2.4-3.6; High 3.7-5.
- Submission (1-5) measures desire for dominance; Power (1-5) measures arousal from control. Both use Low 1-2.3; Moderate 2.4-3.6; High 3.7-5.
- Caring for One's Partner (1-5) measures partner well-being: Lower partner-care focus 1-2.3; Balanced partner-care focus 2.4-3.6; Stronger partner-care focus 3.7-5. Comfort (1-5) measures relief: Low comfort motive 1-2.3; Moderate comfort motive 2.4-3.6; High comfort motive 3.7-5.
- Partner Significance (1-5) measures partner affirmation: Low partner-affirmation motive 1-2.4; Moderate partner-affirmation motive 2.5-3.6; High partner-affirmation motive 3.7-5. Self-Worth (1-5) measures self-validation: Lower need for affirmation 1-2.3; Balanced affirmation 2.4-3.6; High need for recognition 3.7-5.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
The 62 statements use five response positions from strong disagreement to strong agreement, with an unsure middle option. Their themes include pleasure, affection, coping, dominance, submission, care, and recognition, so the result is read as a pattern across motives rather than a verdict from one item.
The nsfw test format is direct self-report: responses produce eight displayed dimension scores from 1 to 5. Bands describe positions within this scoring system, not population norms or universal thresholds; high scores are not automatically healthy or unhealthy.
AMORE (Hill & Preston, 1996) is the closest conceptual and measurement reference. This questionnaire is conceptually consistent with AMORE’s dispositional sexual motives, but is not the published instrument itself. Hill (1997) distinguishes motives from desire and partner attributes, while Schachner and Shaver (2004) relate motives to attachment dimensions.
As a sexual test quiz, the profile can organize reflection about recurring needs and relationship meanings. Results may shift with current mood, relationship context, disclosure, and self-awareness, so the profile is a snapshot of personal tendencies rather than a diagnosis.
- Hill, C. A., & Preston, L. K. (1996). Individual differences in the experience of sexual motivation: Theory and measurement of dispositional sexual motives. Journal of Sex Research, 33(1), 27-45. 10.1080/00224499609551812
- Hill, C. A. (1997). The distinctiveness of sexual motives in relation to sexual desire and desirable partner attributes. Journal of Sex Research, 34(2), 139-153. 10.1080/00224499709551878
- Schachner, D. A., & Shaver, P. R. (2004). Attachment dimensions and sexual motives. Personal Relationships, 11(2), 179-195. 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2004.00077.x
Updated: