Cyberaggression Questionnaire (CYBA) Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Never
- Rarely
- Often
- Always
- Never
- Rarely
- Often
- Always
- Never
- Rarely
- Often
- Always
Cyberaggression Questionnaire (CYBA) Test - Description and methodology of the test
People who want to examine their own conduct in digital spaces can use the Cyberaggression Questionnaire (CYBA) Test to consider actions that may harm, pressure, embarrass, or manipulate others online. This online aggression test is intended for self-reflection: it organizes reported behaviors into a profile, helping readers notice which forms of digital aggression deserve closer attention.
What This Assessment Explores
The questionnaire examines behavior rather than motives alone. Items address insults, rumors, threats, unwanted sexual content, humiliating recordings, exclusion, false complaints, and misuse of identity or private material. Readers reviewing their own conduct can use this cyber aggression questionnaire. The profile shows which forms are more prominent and how the overall pattern is classified.
The displayed profile contains four scales:
- Verbal-Visual (11-44) measures insults, threats, rumors, and harmful altered or embarrassing media; Low 11-21, Moderate 22-32, High 33-44.
- Sexting (5-20) measures unwanted sexual messages or images; Low 5-9, Moderate 10-14, High 15-20.
- Impersonation (3-12) measures aggressive or manipulative use of another identity; Low 3-5, Moderate 6-8, High 9-12.
- Integrative Cyberaggression Scale (19-76) combines the assessed forms; Low 19-37, Moderate 38-56, High 57-76 show the overall level.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each item uses a four-point frequency response: 1 Never, 2 Rarely, 3 Often, or 4 Always. The statements describe concrete online or mobile-phone behaviors, and displayed scores are interpreted through scale definitions and result bands. Those bands are descriptive result levels, not norm-referenced or clinical cutoffs; they do not by themselves establish standardized online scoring.
The closest published instrument is CYBA (Álvarez-García et al., 2016), whose structure supports the separation of verbal-visual aggression, sexting, impersonation, and an overall measure. This questionnaire is conceptually consistent with that work, but it is not presented as a direct reproduction of the published instrument. Sharov (2020) provides evidence concerning a Russian version of CYBA. Nocentini et al. (2010) helps situate the range of behaviors and labels used in cyberaggression research, while Anderson and Bushman (2002) offer a broader account of aggression as behavior intended to harm another person.
CYBA test results remain sensitive to self-report: recall, social desirability, current conflict, and personal understanding of each situation can affect scores; a result cannot by itself establish intent or explain a wider relationship.
- Álvarez-García, D., Barreiro-Collazo, A., Núñez, J. C., & Dobarro, A. (2016). Validity and reliability of the Cyber-aggression Questionnaire for Adolescents (CYBA). The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 8(2), 69-77. 10.1016/j.ejpal.2016.02.003
- Sharov, Alexey A. (2020). Measuring Cyber Aggression: Development of Russian Version of CYBA Questionnaire. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, 9(2), 118-125. 10.18500/2304-9790-2020-9-2-118-125
- Nocentini, Annalaura, Calmaestra, Juan, Schultze-Krumbholz, Anja, Scheithauer, Herbert, Ortega, Rosario, & Menesini, Ersilia. (2010). Cyberbullying: Labels, Behaviours and Definition in Three European Countries. Australian Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 20(2), 129-142. 10.1375/ajgc.20.2.129
- Anderson, Craig A., & Bushman, Brad J. (2002). Human Aggression. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 27-51. 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135231