Child Aggressiveness Assessment Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Yes
- No
- Yes
- No
- Yes
- No
Child Aggressiveness Assessment Test - Description and methodology of the test
Adults who want a structured way to reflect on a child’s behavior can use the Child Aggressiveness Assessment Test to organize observations and decide what examples to discuss with a parent, teacher, or clinician. As a child aggression test, this questionnaire can turn scattered concerns into a clearer starting point for considering context, consistency, and practical next steps.
What This Assessment Explores
The questionnaire focuses on how aggression may appear in everyday conduct rather than one isolated outburst. Items touch on irritability, sulky moods, anger when teased, arguing, retaliation after being hurt, resistance to instructions, blaming after failure, and urges to damage objects. Other prompts address teasing animals, fighting, dominance, and disregard for peers, while some reflect confidence and a wish to lead. This aggression assessment for children uses those situations to help a reader consider frequency, intensity, and social context.
One result is reported as Aggressiveness Level (0-20), with three bands:
- Low, 0-5, may indicate suppressed aggression and may also warrant attention.
- Average, 6-15, is considered normative for the measured pattern in the catalogue’s interpretation.
- High, 16-20, may warrant additional attention and, if needed, referral to a specialist.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each prompt describes a recognizable behavior or reaction and offers Yes/No choices. This binary format simplifies responding but compresses frequency, severity, and context into one answer. The questionnaire reports a displayed result, but it does not specify how each Yes/No response contributes to it.
The questionnaire is conceptually consistent with and closely matches in wording and result bands the 20-item child-aggressiveness method described by Lavrentieva and Titarenko. Its themes also overlap with hostility categories identified by Buss and Durkee and aggression dimensions described by Buss and Perry. Those publications provide relevant comparison points, not documentation of this online questionnaire’s standardization, reliability, or clinical thresholds.
Interpretation of the child aggressiveness score from this questionnaire can be influenced by the respondent’s perspective, current stress, wording interpretation, and observer expectations. Read the result with concrete examples across settings and over time; one score cannot explain why behavior occurs or determine the appropriate response. It is not a diagnosis.
- Lavrentieva, G. P., & Titarenko, T. M. (1992). Practical Psychology for the Educator (Vol. 1, 196 pp.). Kyiv: Vipol.
- Buss, A. H., & Durkee, A. (1957). An inventory for assessing different kinds of hostility. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21(4), 343-349. 10.1037/h0046900
- Buss, A. H., & Perry, M. (1992). The aggression questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(3), 452-459. 10.1037//0022-3514.63.3.452
Updated: