Personality Orientation in the Online Environment Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- I never do this
- I do this occasionally
- I often do this
- I never do this
- I do this from time to time
- I often do this
- I never do this
- I do this occasionally
- I often do this
Personality Orientation in the Online Environment Test - Description and methodology of the test
For people examining how they behave in digital communities, this assessment offers a structured way to consider recurring online tendencies without reducing a person to one label. The Personality Orientation in the Online Environment Test organizes those tendencies into a profile that can help respondents notice patterns in communication, participation, and relationships. The resulting online behavior profile can support reflection by giving someone a clearer view of recurring online behavior.
What This Assessment Explores
Questions describe online actions involving exclusion, insults, provocation, unsolicited messages, unlicensed content, and rule violations. Readers can examine online behavioral tendencies within specific dimensions and a broader pattern. The displayed dimensions are:
- Tendency to Use Unlicensed Content (0-10) measures willingness to violate copyright through pirated or unlicensed materials: Low 0-2, Moderate 3-4, High 5-10.
- Propensity for Spamming (0-4) measures a predisposition to send unsolicited messages or information: Low 0-1, Moderate 2-2, High 3-4.
- Trolling Tendency (0-4) measures provoking users into emotional reactions or conflicts: Low 0-1, Moderate 2-2, High 3-4.
- Cyberbullying Tendency (0-4) measures aggressive or insulting behavior toward other Internet users: Low 0-1, Moderate 2-3, High 4-4.
- Antisocial Behavior in the Online Environment (0-40) measures violating norms and rules in online communities: Low 0-12, Moderate 13-40 may reflect situational violations that do not form a stable pattern.
Methodology and Evidence Base
Each statement presents a possible online action, and the respondent chooses one of three options from never to often. Items cover harassment, provocation, spam-like activity, rule testing, and copyright-infringing or unlicensed content. Separate scores are displayed for the listed dimensions, including the broader antisocial-behavior scale. Bands are supplied, but the questionnaire does not state how many points each answer contributes, so a point-by-point formula should not be inferred.
The questionnaire is conceptually consistent with the OPBIS questionnaire, a standardized instrument that closely matches its construct and item themes. It is not the same version or an established adaptation, so its norms, reliability estimates, and validation procedures should not be transferred unchanged.
A separate study on cyberbullying propensity and emotional characteristics associated with aggressive online conduct adds context to the questionnaire’s cyberbullying themes. The questionnaire lets respondents examine digital behavior patterns across dimensions and the situations behind answers. Self-report is sensitive to current context, memory, social desirability, and self-awareness, so the profile should not be treated as a diagnosis or a complete account of behavior.
- Zekeriaev, R. I. (2022). Standardization of the Questionnaire "Orientation of Personality Behavior in the Internet Space." Modern Science: Actual Problems of Theory and Practice. Series: Cognition, no. 3, pp. 52-56.
- Zekeriaev, R. I. (2023). Psychological Characteristics of the Emotional Orientation of a Person Prone to Cyberbullying. Psychology in Education, 5(3), 426-434. 10.33910/2686-9527-2023-5-3-426-434
Updated: