Motivation for Learning Among Teacher Education Students Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Not significant at all
- Not significant
- Significant to some extent
- Significant
- A very significant motive
- Not significant at all
- Not significant
- Somewhat significant
- Significant
- Very significant
- Not at all important as a motive
- Not important
- Somewhat important
- Important
- Very important as a motive
Motivation for Learning Among Teacher Education Students Test - Description and methodology of the test
Students preparing for, entering, or reflecting on teacher education can use the Motivation for Learning Among Teacher Education Students Test to examine what sustains their academic choices and effort. The result creates a teacher education student motivation profile across professional aims, knowledge seeking, social approval, practical rewards, and outside pressure. It is useful when a learner wants to understand competing reasons behind study behavior.
What This Assessment Explores
Learning motivation assessment shows:
- Professional Motives (7-35), Actual Learning Motives (7-35), and Extrinsic Learning Motivation (21-105) show: Low 7-16; Moderate 17-26; High 27-35; Low external drive 7-16; Moderate external drive 17-26; High external drive 27-35; Low external motivation 21-49; Moderate external motivation 50-77; High external motivation 78-105.
- Professional Motives (5-25), Actual Learning Motives (5-25), and Motives for Entering Higher Education (5-25) show: Low 5-11; Moderate 12-18; High 19-25; Low 5-11; Moderate 12-18; High 19-25; Low 5-12; Moderate 13-18; High 19-25.
- Intrinsic Learning Motivation (21-105) and Motives for Entering University (7-35) show: Low 21-49; Moderate 50-77; High 78-105; Low external admission motive 7-16; Moderate external admission motive 17-26; High external admission motive 27-35.
Methodology and Evidence Base
Each item asks how significant a motive is, using five ordered responses from 1, Not significant at all, to 5, Very significant. The sample covers professional interest, deep knowledge, preparation, grades, approval, employment, and avoidance of unwanted circumstances. Responses are combined within the displayed scales; the published ranges and bands define interpretation, so the answer-to-point rule should not be inferred.
The closest named source is the Pedagogical University Student Learning Motivation Method (Ketko & Pakulina, 2010). As a motivation questionnaire for teacher education students, it is conceptually consistent with that work, not presented as a direct adaptation. Ovchinnikov (2007) and Pakulina (2008) provide related context on how learning motives develop and are structured, while Ryan and Deci (2000) distinguish intrinsic from extrinsic motivation.
Results are most useful when internal and external patterns are read together rather than treated as a verdict. The online format supplies interpretive bands but no established population norms, reliability estimates, or clinical cutoffs. Honest self-report, current circumstances, and limited self-awareness can shift the profile, which describes reported motivational tendencies rather than observed classroom performance.
- Ketko, S. M., & Pakulina, S. A. (2010). Diagnostics Method of Learning Motivation in Pedagogical University Students. Psychological-Educational Studies, 2(1), Article 7.
- Ovchinnikov, M. V. (2007). Dynamics of Learning Motivation of Pedagogical University Students and Its Formation: Dissertation for the Candidate of Psychological Sciences. Kurgan, Russia, 214 pp.
- Pakulina, S. A. (2008). Adaptive Abilities of Pedagogical University Students: Structure, Factors, and Means of Development. Moscow: SGU Press, 201 pp.
- Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67. 10.1006/ceps.1999.1020