Assessment of Professional-Psychological Personality Type Test


How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Example Questions From the Test
- Completely disagree
- Agree to a small extent
- Agree almost halfway
- Agree halfway
- Agree more than halfway
- Agree almost completely
- Completely agree
- Strongly disagree
- Agree to a small extent
- Agree slightly
- Agree somewhat
- Agree more than somewhat
- Agree almost completely
- Strongly agree
- Completely disagree
- Agree to a small extent
- Agree almost halfway
- Agree halfway
- Agree more than halfway
- Agree almost completely
- Agree completely
/https://cdn.freudly.ai/media/tests/799/image/1761656926_day_image_20251028_130845.png)
Assessment of Professional-Psychological Personality Type Test - Symptoms and Signs
This measure is designed to support a rapid, structured appraisal of work-related behavioral tendencies in organizational settings. Assessment of Professional-Psychological Personality Type provides an index of an individual’s typical approach to work tasks and interpersonal functioning at work.
The instrument includes 36 items and typically takes about 7 minutes to complete. Items are intended to capture patterns relevant to role preferences (e.g., leadership, task execution, communication, and idea generation) that may inform team composition, role assignment, and development planning.
Assessment of Professional-Psychological Personality Type should be interpreted as a descriptive profile rather than a diagnostic indicator and is best integrated with other sources of information (e.g., interview, supervisor input, and job demands). When authorship is cited, it is commonly attributed to John L. Holland.