Problem Solving Quiz

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Use the available data to optimize for the most common routine.
- Launch a small version and revise it according to what happens.
- Invite people with the different routines to identify impacts and shape adjustments.
- Keep the design simple enough for individuals to adapt on their own.
- Whether the people affected felt that it worked well for them.
- Whether it can be modified into a more original solution.
- Whether the team can implement it quickly with minimal debate.
- Whether evidence shows why it worked and under which conditions.
- Ask everyone involved where the handoff feels most difficult.
- Map each step and compare where delays occur across recent weeks.
- Try a redesigned workflow immediately and see whether it helps.
- Choose the quickest workable adjustment based on experience.
Problem Solving Quiz - Description and methodology of the test
People who want to understand their default way of handling uncertainty, competing priorities, or stalled plans can use this problem solving quiz as a practical profile exercise. It suits readers comparing habits across work, study, projects, or everyday decisions. As a problem solving assessment, it shows which approach is most characteristic and where two approaches may work together.
What This Assessment Explores
Questions focus on incomplete information, disagreement, failed methods, and practical constraints. They sample preferences for evidence, dialogue, reframing, experimentation, and adaptation. For readers using a problem solving skills quiz to name their habits, the result offers a profile rather than a pass-or-fail judgment.
The three profile dimensions are:
- Analytical Solver (0-15) reflects affinity for evidence, structure, comparison, and step-by-step reasoning: Situational (0-5), Available (6-10), Signature (11-15).
- Collaborative Solver (0-15) reflects affinity for gathering perspectives, shared understanding, and solutions developed with others: Situational (0-5), Available (6-10), Signature (11-15).
- Creative Solver (0-15) reflects affinity for reframing, alternatives, experimentation, and unexpected connections: Situational (0-5), Available (6-10), Signature (11-15).
The highest score indicates your strongest affinity. If another score is within one point, the result represents a blended profile.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each item presents a practical dilemma with four response choices. Across the scenarios, the themes include changing a plan for different users, resolving disagreement, learning from failure, weighing constraints, engaging stakeholders, and testing alternatives. The selected responses are summarized into three profile scores rather than a single overall total. The questionnaire reports three profile scores, but it does not specify how each response contributes to them; interpret the scores through the scale definitions and the highest-score or blended-result rule.
The questionnaire is conceptually consistent with VIEW (Selby et al., 2004), a published framework that treats individual style as a pattern of preferences in approaching challenges rather than as a measure of general ability. Treffinger, Selby, and Isaksen (2008) also describe how style relates to learning and applying creative methods.
The resulting profile of problem-solving styles is not presented as a standardized administration or direct adaptation of either publication, and because responses are self-reported, current pressures, the imagined situation, and self-awareness can influence the pattern. Answering for your usual behavior, rather than an ideal response, gives the profile a clearer basis for reflection.
- Edwin C. Selby, Donald J. Treffinger, Scott G. Isaksen, and Kenneth J. Lauer (2004). Defining and Assessing Problem-Solving Style: Design and Development of a New Tool. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 38(4), 221-243. 10.1002/j.2162-6057.2004.tb01242.x
- Donald J. Treffinger, Edwin C. Selby, and Scott G. Isaksen (2008). Understanding individual problem-solving style: A key to learning and applying creative problem solving. Learning and Individual Differences, 18(4), 390-401. 10.1016/j.lindif.2007.11.007
Updated: